I was part of a EU commission project once to define a metadata standard for sharing of cultural assets. It consisted of developers and managers for many different companies that were active in the cultural sector.<p>The end result was an abomination, in which every company fought to have a little bit of their tech included in the final specification.<p>I can't imagine Gaia-X being any different. To be honest, most members are probably in it for the same reason we were - free money.
appreciate the post but... is this a problem? i'm a euro software dev and i've never even heard of gaia-x<p>if this gaia-x thing dies (or not), organizations in europe will carry on using AWS, Azure etc without noticing or caring, no?
Interesting. So it seems that Gaia-X is a process that defines how to talk about discussing things that could be done without defining what those things could actually be or do. It is a meta-meta level. Hmmm... Let's discuss how to discuss things...