I feel like there's a lot to dislike here. "copyright law is notoriously complicated", yeah, because there's a combination of lawyerly careful parsing as if "common sense" everyday language has precise, consistent definitions.<p>We're told in many ways that music, especially popular music, and movies, especially popular movies, and prose to a lesser extent, are the obvious, explicit property of corporate entities. Any copying or imitation is immoral theft.<p>Now, corporate entities are doing the copying and imitation, and we're told it's not copying or imitation at all!<p>If you have it both ways, people correctly suspect that the legalities are such that the few extract money from, and control the many, an unsustainable situation.