TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

China is stockpiling – we must do the same

43 pointsby jseliger9 months ago

9 comments

Gathering66789 months ago
&quot;it is spending about $700 billion&quot;<p>Where is the number from? Stockholm International Peace Research Institute estimates China&#x27;s military expenditure in 2022 to be $292.0 billion, trailing $877.0 billion of US. (source: [Wikipedia](<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Military_budget_of_China" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Military_budget_of_China</a>))<p>There are not a lot more numbers (let alone numbers with sources) in the article. China has a lot of EV batteries because it is leading in promoting EV usage. It stockpiles a lot of agricultural products because, well, there are a lot of mouths to feed.
评论 #41182865 未加载
评论 #41179605 未加载
评论 #41179433 未加载
DrScientist9 months ago
Places like China and India etc have huge human resources and will inevitably [1] catch up the West in terms of economic power.<p>We have two broad choices<p>- brutally suppress development in these countries to remain &#x27;top dog&#x27; or<p>- continue to build those international structures that were founded after the second world war - like the UN, that were designed to stop a repeat of WWII.<p>I fear the current approach of unpicking international norms and constraints in order to be able to do more of option 1 is leading us to WWWIII, not protecting us from it.<p>[1] If we don&#x27;t take option 1 above.
评论 #41182235 未加载
评论 #41180377 未加载
评论 #41182285 未加载
评论 #41180618 未加载
yamrzou9 months ago
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.is&#x2F;o4hME" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.is&#x2F;o4hME</a>
maxglute9 months ago
US sanctions on PRC limit what PRC can buy now, may be confiscated pending US admin to prevent PRC spending later.<p>Meanwhile PRC trade surplus huge -&gt; PRC USD reserves huge -&gt; USD is strong and commodity prices not too whack due to global slow down.<p>Why not stock up now? Eventual global recovery could trigger expensive commodity super cycle. Would it be helpful in war, sure. But PRC needs to build up nukes first, going to take a few years for 50% parity.
kkfx9 months ago
When climate change people have to change, this means migrations, war for resources etc, ANYONE wise do it&#x27;s best to be as resilient and resourceful as possible. Accidentally this is the opposite of modern nazi-management paradigm.
评论 #41180627 未加载
snapplebobapple9 months ago
This guy misses the point (although he is right we should be stockpiling munitions and a bunch of other strategic things). China has to stockpile because they are net importers of almost all raw resources and a decently long list of countries can field a naval force strong enough to, for example, block the strait of malacca which would hobble them in months, not years. There&#x27;s no equivalent for America on everything (There are pain points like semiconductors but they are pain points for everyone, not just america. The big ticket items (food and energy) can be handled internally at this point).
OutOfHere9 months ago
China is accumulating commodities that will make its currency a dominating one in the global reserve currency space. It&#x27;s a long term play, and I don&#x27;t believe it has anything to do with Trump or Taiwan.
评论 #41184141 未加载
McDyver9 months ago
This opinion piece is so loaded with fear mongering, divisiveness and subtle suggestions of &quot;faits accomplis&quot;, that I can&#x27;t read it without propaganda alarms sounding everywhere
评论 #41184679 未加载
评论 #41180650 未加载
评论 #41180329 未加载
r0ckarong9 months ago
So engage in a resource war and anything else really than putting any effort in stopping Trump. Got it.