I find most scientists I know startlingly bad at philosophy, and startlingly arrogant about how much science actually tells us. If only more people read philosophy instead of Popular Science.
See also, Betteridge's Law of Headlines <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridges_Law_of_Headlines" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridges_Law_of_Headlines</a>
The two linked articles<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/books/review/a-universe-from-nothing-by-lawrence-m-krauss.html?_r=3" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/books/review/a-universe-fr...</a> being David Alpert's review of Lawrence Kraus's book, and<p><a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/04/has-physics-made-philosophy-and-religion-obsolete/256203/" rel="nofollow">http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/04/has-ph...</a> being an interview in which Kraus responds to the charges,<p>are far more interesting than this piece of borderline-blogspam, which claims to settle the question merely by overstating what Kraus originally said (I don't think he ever claimed that physics subsumes <i>all</i> of philosophy, only some areas).