The Latex to Quarkdown comparison in the github README[0] is a much better introduction than the slide show.<p>Or, maybe I'm just an old and ornery programmer who frequently says in his head "GET TO THE POINT!"<p>[0]: <a href="https://github.com/iamgio/quarkdown?tab=readme-ov-file#comparison">https://github.com/iamgio/quarkdown?tab=readme-ov-file#compa...</a>
Very interesting. If people keeps creating their own extensions of Markdown it's because there's a need somewhere for a comprehensive markup language. Markdown wasn't invented with documentation in mind, for example, so now we have rST, Asciidoc, Markdoc, Djot, etc. I really wish a powerful standard emerged, though.
I like it. It's not complex but you can do complex stuff. It is why I use AsciiDoc. I don't think creating a new (and better) markdown will win hearts... yes it is nice but you need to compete with a lot of attempts to improve it. ... relevant XKCD: <a href="https://xkcd.com/927/" rel="nofollow">https://xkcd.com/927/</a>
I guess OP never get why there is markdown in first place. Why another scripting lang inside Markdown which suppose to be readble , natural to write , easy to render.<p>```<p>.function {greet}<p><pre><code> to from:
\*Hello, .to\* from .from!
</code></pre>
.greet {world} from:{Giorgio}<p>```<p>No Hell No , You don't need that in a markdown-like doc. If you want that just use HTML with js. or MDSvex .