Sadly my experience shows that people who believe that mobile phones ARE linked to brain cancer also don't believe in studies that show the opposite<p>edited for clarity
“Led by the Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (Arpansa), the systematic review examined more than 5,000 studies from which the most scientifically rigorous were identified and weak studies were excluded.”<p>This is not a new study. It’s a review and meta-analysis of existing studies.<p>It is always hard for me to believe that the decisions on which studies to exclude can be done in an unbiased way.
How could it be? The radiation wavelength is far too high to cause any sort of chemistry. I know there are those that will still believe it does though.
> commissioned by the World Health Organization<p>The WHO was a huge advocate for contact tracing during COVID. Many countries simply accept their guidelines for public health standards. Given how corrupt the funding of medical/scientijfic studies are, this is not to be trusted.