>which helped <i>crashed</i> the value of used Tesla vehicles<p>>Tesla vehicles would never be able of true self-driving due to some <i>bling</i> spots in the camera arrays<p>In the age of AI, how can you still publish an article like this?
It's good that Tesla is explicitly stating FSD requires supervision, and my impression is that the FSD purchase page has implied a driver may need to intervene since 2017 or 2018.<p>FSD has gotten significantly better too, which I imagine is why they need to be more precise with what it can and cannot do.<p>Also, FSD started at $8k. IIRC, it went up to $15k after the pandemic.
That’s good because they were totally unreasonable promises. I’m surprised nobody sued for false advertising. People paid a lot of money for something that has never lived up to the hype.
Tesla's do fully drive themselves. They are FSD.<p>Now, there being an "official", legally-protected definition for that is another thing.<p>Level 5 self-driving vehicles won't even have controls for humans.<p>But again, Tesla's are already fully self-driving.