Hey HN, would love some feedback on our Jupyter Notebook review tool!<p>We help data science teams check one another's work and share knowledge that's stored in Jupyter Notebooks.<p>Currently, we integrate with GitHub, allowing for review comment submissions, pull request approval, comments on markdown and code cells that sync with GitHub.<p>Happy to answer any questions!
My immediate thoughts are:<p>- this landing page needs an indication of how to get started using this, and it should be low friction. I see there's a sign in button -- it should probably say "get started" or similar.<p>- you need to explain your pricing model and what it takes to get started using this: is it a browser plugin? A separate / parallel platform? Does anything need to be installed? Is it as simple as authing to your platform with gh?<p>- clarity on whether this works for private repos -- prospects will be wondering this. Presumably it does otherwise it's not very useful<p>- for your target audience, you need some lip service explaining why someone would want this -- lots of the people you are targeting don't use PR oriented development flows, sadly<p>- clarity on whether pr comments / approvals / etc live in GitHub vs your platform, what does / doesn't get mapped over, etc.<p>You don't need to answer these questions here, this is just what your prospects will be thinking
Is this just a copy of reviewnb which has been around for years?<p>If this is new I'm doubtful you already have all those logos as your customers. It doesn't build trust to make claims if they aren't true.