TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

EVinci nuclear microreactor moves towards commercialization

34 pointsby peutetre8 months ago

6 comments

atomic1288 months ago
Reactors like this (and like Bill Gates&#x27; Natrium reactor) use HALEU (high-assay low-enriched uranium) which is above 19% fissile (U-235), compared to the usual 5% or 6% in a large pressurized water reactor (e.g., <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;AP1000" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;AP1000</a>).<p>For comparison, a nuclear bomb or military microreactor (on a submarine, for example) uses fuel that&#x27;s 90%+ fissile. This difference in fissile concentration is the reason why non-military nuclear reactors can never explode like a nuclear bomb.<p>The bottleneck for nuclear energy is the yellowcake. This is the uranium that comes out of the ground, which is 0.7% fissile and must be enriched. A pound of HALEU requires many pounds of yellowcake. Conversion and enrichment are also in short supply today, but the centrifuges can be built.<p>There is a profound near-term undersupply of this natural uranium due to the fact that the mining companies were allowed to die after Fukushima. The mining companies died due to low uranium prices: $16 per pound at the market bottom.<p>The two big miners that survived (Cameco and Kazatomprom) are together unable to increase supply to match demand. Big new mines, like NexGen&#x27;s, are years away, and the supply they provide will not close the supply&#x2F;demand gap. Mining uranium is slow and difficult, even if you have access to good ore.<p>Alternative sources of uranium are even more expensive to exploit (seawater, phosphate deposits, etc.).<p>If you want to benefit (monetarily) from nuclear energy, and you&#x27;re willing to suffer through the EXTREME volatility of owning a niche commodity, one way is through the Sprott Physical Uranium Trust (ticker: SRUUF) which owns 65 million pounds of uranium oxide and purchases more whenever it trades above Net Asset Value. WARNING: this is not an investment for the faint of heart. YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED.<p>You can watch the spot uranium market (intra-day bid&#x2F;ask) here: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;numerco.com&#x2F;NSet&#x2F;aCNSet.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;numerco.com&#x2F;NSet&#x2F;aCNSet.html</a><p>You can see the uranium long-term contract price (and spot uranium price) monthly history at Cameco&#x27;s website here: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cameco.com&#x2F;invest&#x2F;markets&#x2F;uranium-price" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cameco.com&#x2F;invest&#x2F;markets&#x2F;uranium-price</a>
killingtime748 months ago
Given the extensive security requirements for nuclear and the cost of this reactor itself, I struggle to see how it can be cost effective compared to renewables or even a diesel generator. Discussions on hacker News, which is very pro nuclear always tend to emphasise the technical advantages and neglect economic considerations.
评论 #41664058 未加载
评论 #41665311 未加载
评论 #41664185 未加载
评论 #41663976 未加载
moralestapia8 months ago
This is great and I think is the way to go.<p>&gt;produces a self-limiting nuclear reaction that cannot go out of control<p>Anyone knows if this holds true even if someone tampers with the device?
bbojan8 months ago
In my opinion TRISO fuel is bad because it has very low burn-up and is difficult to re-process.<p>These things together mean it has quite low utilization of enriched uranium.
评论 #41665643 未加载
Log_out_8 months ago
So what happens if the alkali elements can not remove heat, for example during a fire?
BMc20208 months ago
Can someone knowledgeable tell me what happens if you blow it up?