Larry Wall once reputedly said: "The three attributes of a programmer are; impatience, laziness and hubris". He didn't mean that hackers sit around in front of the TV or wasting their time, that they're too impatient to sit down and take some time to do anything, or so hubristic that they can't listen to other ideas. All three of these attributes have negative connotations, but all are meant in a positive way.<p>Hackers are impatient as they don't want to hang around wasting time when they could be solving the "real" problem. They don't want to be jumping through pointless political hoops before they can get to real work.<p>They are lazy because they don't want to have to type in the same command 50 times with small variance in the command - they write a script to do it for them. This script is by far the better solution, not only saving time now, but saving time in the future and expanding the hackers experience and knowledge.<p>Hackers are hubristic not because they think their ideas are the best, or they can do anything. Far from it, hackers are very often very deferential to other, more senior hackers, and very often use other "good" solutions as part of their own. You need to have some sort of hubris to actually start a bit of work in the first place. Without hubris, the Linux kernel probably would never have been started.<p>[1] <a href="http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?UsersAreSmarterThanProgrammers" rel="nofollow">http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?UsersAreSmarterThanProgrammers</a>
"I divide my officers into four groups. There are clever, diligent, stupid, and lazy officers. Usually two characteristics are combined. Some are clever and diligent -- their place is the General Staff. The next lot are stupid and lazy -- they make up 90 percent of every army and are suited to routine duties. Anyone who is both clever and lazy is qualified for the highest leadership duties, because he possesses the intellectual clarity and the composure necessary for difficult decisions. One must beware of anyone who is stupid and diligent -- he must not be entrusted with any responsibility because he will always cause only mischief." Kurt von Hammerstein-Equordn (German General)
This isn't lazy so much as efficient, you are swapping manual effort for mental effort.<p>For example.<p>Go to a lazy person's house and the whole place is a mess;
Go to a diligent persons house and it is very tidy, because they clean everything top to bottom.
Go to an engineer's house and they have arranged everything so that it can be made reasonably clean in under 30 mins.
Misattributed to Bill Gates: "I will always choose a lazy person to do a difficult job, because he will find an easy way to do it". I'm not sure who that's actually from, but the idea behind it is the same. However, one has to remember that to innovate while being lazy isn't actually simple. I won't go out of my way to make something cool and innovative because, well, I'm lazy. It's only when it saves <i>me</i> time and I absolutely have to do it, that I'll come up with great ideas (as "S" did when faced with her favorite toy).
> The one who invented multiplication did not want to add numbers all life<p>Reminds me of favorite fact from 'The Information'. The original use of logarithms was by human 'computers', literally, people paid to run the calculations to fill tables, which were then printed and sold in books. They used them to turn difficult multiplication and division problems into simpler addition and subtraction (reducing error and effort apparently). Sometimes I think math should be taught with much more historical context!
I'd rather spend 29 minutes coding a solution to a repetitive 30-minute task, even if it required more brainwork than just going through the motions. At least I'm getting some experience out of the grunt work.
Read the book "Thinking, fast and slow." We are genetically programmed (as are all living things) to conserve energy and make things easier for ourselves. I guess the author could more accurately replace "lazy" with "make things easier" and be more accurate. It drives everything we do as human beings, from politics (read Frederic Bastiat's works) to everyday lives (driving instead of walking to work, choosing to type rather than write a note).<p>It's the people who realize "this could be done more easily" that innovate. I guess lazy is just a simpler way of saying it.
Laziness definitely drives people to innovation, but being bored with what's currently being done is another indicator of an innovator. I would almost say even more so because laziness implies no wanting to do something.
Lazy people plan more and in that are more likely to find the optimal solution.<p>They also put of things and alot of tasks negate themselfs or were redundant to start with. Manager asking for a report say. You could do it then and drop other things or you could leave it and if it is important you will get chassed up for it. If this happens alot a lazy person will write a script to do it, not tell said manager and gain from it. Others do the script, tell the manager and then get workbombed for no extra return. Lazy is in many ways another word for smart. Thing is though when you say lazy, most people think of poor hygiene, says alot about them mostly.
My physics teacher in high school used to say inventors are insane. They invest 100x the time to solve a problem then it would take to just do the work. But they are so happy when they can do it in 1/10th the time when they have their new invention.<p>Meanwhile everyone watches in horror as the inventor spends all that time looking for the solution thinking how insane the inventor is because they could just "do the work already".
If lazy people really do innovate then I am surely the god of innovation. One day I will actually make the effort to lift my hands and do something besides flip the channel with my TV remote.<p>Seriously though, I get what the writer is talking about though I would think it is more of a desire for efficiency. I don't want to keep writing the same code repeatedly but that isn't really laziness.
Innovation comes more from impatient people, not lazy people. There is very wide gap between impatient and the lazy. The guy who invented multiplication wasn't lazy (as mentioned in the article, or else he won't do work for invention, which is always harder than adding numbers), but he probably did it because he couldn't wait long enough for all the answers he wanted.
One of my computer scientist professors once said: "A good computer scientist solves problems. A great computer scientist creates tools that solve problems."
In a similar vein, I attribute my passion for UX and design to my stupidity; I need things to be as straight-forward/easy/friendly as possible. I can be pretty annoying to be around when a process (airports, business protocols, etc.) don't make sense or are much more difficult than they need to be, but sometimes things are so backwards you wonder how anything gets done at all.
I would read the post, but it's quite unreadable on my Chrome run on Windows. Understandably, I would most definitely find numerous ways of making the text readable for myself (copy paste to notepad, or disable CSS etc), but it's not the point. That serif font is simply terrible.
<< Used Autohotkey to automate saving porn images to disk with Google Chrome.<p>Programmer laziness = You are doing something that annoys you because it's slow so you take a whole day scripting and automating something that accelerates it.<p>Ofc, didn't take me a day to do that.
Heinlen did it already...<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_Enough_for_Love#The_Tale_of_the_Man_Who_Was_Too_Lazy_to_Fail" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_Enough_for_Love#The_Tale_o...</a>
We at www.RealEstateDealStreet.com think that it is not laziness make them innovative but time they spent on thinking make them innovative and lay man thinks that thinking as laziness.