TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Meta Fires Employee Making $400k per Year over a $25 Meal Voucher

48 pointsby adzicg7 months ago

17 comments

simple107 months ago
For liability reasons, HR needs a reason to fire someone to avoid potential wrongful termination lawsuit. The meal vouchers just sound like it was an excuse they needed to let some people go. But it makes a good story for the interwebs.
评论 #41873227 未加载
评论 #41873125 未加载
评论 #41873163 未加载
评论 #41873967 未加载
FireBeyond7 months ago
The critical word in this headline is missing (maybe a length issue)...<p>&gt; Meta Fires Employee Making $400,000 Per Year Over a $25 Meal Voucher Issue<p>This wasn&#x27;t one $25 meal voucher, this was employees buying homegoods and pooling credit for other purposes:<p>&gt; some Meta staff opted to buy items like toothpaste and wine glasses with the credit, per The Financial Times. Or they would get dinner delivered at home or pool their credit money together<p>&gt; The staff who were let go routinely misused their vouchers
评论 #41873071 未加载
nithssh7 months ago
I wonder how explicit and clear they were about the intended purpose of these vouchers. I can see myself saying fck it and using it however I feel without thinking much since it seems insignificant, unless they make a deal of it.
daghamm7 months ago
That&#x27;s a click bait title. What actually happend was a little less crazy:<p>&quot;The staff who were let go routinely misused their vouchers, while others who misapplied them less frequently, were reprimanded but not fired.&quot;
评论 #41881123 未加载
potato37328427 months ago
I suspect this is a result of acquisitions. They buy some startup, bring them all under Meta&#x27;s HR umbrella with all the rules and perks that comes with. Since these recently acquired guys are running out of random offices in random places they just give them a stipend rather than force them to all relocate to a campus with dining. Some people are happy, some are unhappy, some don&#x27;t like their new overlords and don&#x27;t feel bad abusing the system. That&#x27;s just how it goes with these sorts of things.<p>The $400k employee was probably a higher up (or key SME Meta felt they needed to put in golden handcuffs) at one of these acquired companies and was probably already on his or her way out or they were in a position of authority and encouraging&#x2F;condoning abusing the system.<p>You don&#x27;t fire someone like that over ~$100&#x2F;day unless there&#x27;s more to the story.
评论 #41873259 未加载
评论 #41873082 未加载
评论 #41873093 未加载
mvdtnz7 months ago
Sounds like the employees were let go for dishonestly abusing a perk. It&#x27;s hard to tell from the linked article but I presume you get these meal vouchers if you are working early&#x2F;late and are in the office during meal times. These bad apples were using the vouchers to have food delivered to their homes while not working, or buying non-food items. It&#x27;s a clear abuse of the policy and hard to understand why someone making such a good salary would risk it for peanuts - but many of my high-earning friends are also some of the cheapest people I have ever met.
gnabgib7 months ago
Discussion (53 points, 8 hours ago, 79 comments) <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=41868090">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=41868090</a>
JauntTrooper7 months ago
This happens every once in a while in investment banking, and we were warned about it regularly in HR training.<p>Here&#x27;s Matt Levine on one of the incidents: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.bloomberg.com&#x2F;view&#x2F;articles&#x2F;2018-09-04&#x2F;wells-fargo-had-a-fake-dinner-receipt-scandal" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.bloomberg.com&#x2F;view&#x2F;articles&#x2F;2018-09-04&#x2F;wells-far...</a><p>The logic is if you couldn&#x27;t trust a banker to not defraud their employer by submitting dishonest meal receipts, how could you trust them with client money and confidential information. I don&#x27;t disagree.
评论 #41874652 未加载
auggierose7 months ago
Note to myself: Do not accept any vouchers and demand a 20K raise instead.
ChrisArchitect7 months ago
[dupe] Earlier: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=41868090">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=41868090</a>
sandwichsphinx7 months ago
The article doesn&#x27;t mention their role but if someone is fired over $25, can we really justify that they were ever worth a $400k salary?
评论 #41872745 未加载
paxys7 months ago
So we’ve reached a stage where people are outraged over a company firing employees for blatant theft.
评论 #41873833 未加载
theGnuMe7 months ago
I suspect the employee will have a good case for wrongful termination. As these vouchers are subject to income tax ultimately by the IRS vs a traditional corp expense report reimbursement.<p>It’ll likely depend on how the voucher was implemented.
p5v7 months ago
Fine - that’s 400K less per year they have to pay now.
cityofdelusion7 months ago
It takes years to build trust and one second to destroy it. If you are a fully functioning adult and basically stealing the office stapler, how low are you willing to go? It’s not even about the morality of the situation at that point, it’s about being a dishonest liar.<p>The one type of coworker no one gets along with is the dishonest, manipulative, penny-pinching narcissist. Fire them, and there are 10 honest people willing to replace them in this IT oversupply market, probably at lower salary. Win-win for Meta.
dzhiurgis7 months ago
Dura lex sed lex
mmmlinux7 months ago
I mean, $25 may not sound like a lot. but these meal vouchers (assuming every day, 5 days a week) add up to $18,200 per year for the breakfast lunch and dinner combined.<p>That said, what are you going to get on doordash for $25. half a sandwich?
评论 #41873976 未加载