TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Show HN: Llama Workspace – An Open Source ChatGPT Teams Alternative

29 pointsby c9908027 months ago
Hey HN! We are happy to share with you our latest project: Llama Workspace (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;llamaworkspace.ai" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;llamaworkspace.ai</a>).<p>It&#x27;s an open-source ChatGPT Teams alternative made with the needs of businesses and organizations in mind.<p>It has everything you can expect from ChatGPT, plus first class support for users and roles management, as well as advanced collaboration features. We&#x27;ve made it very easy to self-host anywhere you like, and we also provide a cloud version. So no excuse for trying it out!<p>Why using Llama Workspace instead of ChatGPT Teams?<p>- You have access to all the major Large Language models in one place, including GPT-4, Claude Sonnet or Gemini. - It brings savings of about 70% - 85% when compared to ChatGPT Teams (see website for more info on this). - You can integrate it with your own code, like AI agents, and provide a single platform to access AI.<p>Here&#x27;s the Github link: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;llamaworkspace&#x2F;llamaworkspace">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;llamaworkspace&#x2F;llamaworkspace</a><p>I would love to hear your ideas, experience, and feedback about the product! What should we implement next?

4 comments

ganeshkrishnan7 months ago
&gt;Llama Workspace connects to AI providers like OpenAI and Anthropic via API. In the API, each word for the most commonly used model (GPT-4o at the time of writing) costs approximately $0.000025. Therefore, to break even with the ChatGPT Teams license, which costs $30&#x2F;seat&#x2F;month, you would need to generate 1,200,000 words.<p>I would debate this one. As a &quot;normal&quot; user of chatgpt with around 10-20 questions a day, I can exceed this $30 per month because<p>1) it&#x27;s not a word per se but token. A lot of the words are tokenized.<p>2) for each chat, for each question all the context above is re-sent and counts for cost.<p>I think pivoting towards self hosting llama models and charging for them might be more profitable to you and to the users.
评论 #41915878 未加载
aaronharnly7 months ago
Thank you and congratulations!<p>How (in your opinion) does this project compare to <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.librechat.ai" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.librechat.ai</a>?<p>(My company selected LibreChat to host our internal “GPT Teams” implementation after surveying and evaluating the current state of tools as of about six months ago, but I’m sure it’s a rapidly evolving space.)
评论 #41915703 未加载
janderson2157 months ago
Very cool!<p>What is the recommended resource usage for self-hosted? I don’t see it in that section on your site.
评论 #41922847 未加载
vanillax7 months ago
What does this do that ollama webUI cant do? Just curious
评论 #41939025 未加载