Apple sued for violations of both design patents and tech patents. Apple won that Masimo's design infringes on Apple's design patents, for which they only asked for $250. Apple lost the other technology patent infringement parts of the case, for which they were asking for an injunction against Masimo selling their watches.
It looks like Apple's claims were related to the charging of the watch itself... Which brings me to my question of why not use standard USB Type-C charging ports instead of some proprietary charging method? It seems like from the very beginning it is a poor choice, on both parties, to charge a device using a non-standard charging device.
With this case it seems like Apple is just going to take them to court again and again until the well runs dry and Masimo’s patents can be purchased for pennies on the dollar.
<a href="https://www.masimoconsumer.com/" rel="nofollow">https://www.masimoconsumer.com/</a>
Their products feel simultaneously like knock offs and 5 years old all at once.
In every single press release Masimo complains apple hired away staff.<p>Um, you are in California. There are no non-competes.<p>You just are confessing every single time you can’t retain talented staff.
Suggested Title change: s/wins $250/wins only $250.00/<p>That'd minimal editorializing - while making it quite clear that there is no missing 'K', let alone missing 'M'.