I have been using Mikrotik gear for >10 years, and have been impressed ever since, the ROI is incredible and there are so many features I wish were available on other platforms.
It's kind of funny - a fair amount of the major network vendors' hardware (i.e. Cisco, Arista, Juniper, HPE) isn't that much better than what MikroTik has produced at a fraction of the cost. Having a better and faster processor is great, but I don't think it's going to move the needle very much.<p>This really highlights how much the OS on network hardware is actually the biggest barrier to entry to the larger market. It's arguably one of the market segments where open source has traditionally had the least amount of adoption. Things have certainly been changing in recent years certain use-cases (e.g. SONiC and similar for DC switching) but it remains true that the OS itself (and the associated supporting infrastructure) is actually what drives both adoption and stickiness, not the newest/biggest/fastest speeds and feeds.<p>It's been true for a while that if RouterOS could be enhanced and made more attractive (manageability, support, QA, feature roadmap, 3rd part ecosystem, etc) it would make MikroTik a major market disruptor.
MikroTik has been a bit of a behind the scenes player in networking since the beginning - at least in western markets. Even though I don't work in the networking field as much anymore I always look at their product release newsletters and am surprised at the price to performance their equipment provides with new interesting features.<p>I'm really not sure what a "Cloud-Native" processor is - will be interesting to see what comes of this partnership though!
Has Ampere released any new cpus lately? Love the idea of ARM in the datacenter, but seems like the single thread performance has fallen behind desktop processors like the M3.