TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

YouTube quietly made some of its web embeds worse, including ours

96 pointsby Amorymeltzer5 months ago

12 comments

ChrisArchitect5 months ago
Would it have killed him to put an example YouTube embed in the article so we could see the effect?
评论 #42416935 未加载
mrweasel5 months ago
Where YouTube is making a mistake is in showing ads on embedded videos, for YouTube Premium customers and you can no longer click on the embed to go to YouTube and see the video without the ads.<p>I&#x27;m not sure if this is something each site can control using the embed code, but I noticed more and more that embedded videos will no longer allow you to jump youtube.com.
wruza5 months ago
You can simply install uBO (and its dependencies) and the question who’s gonna profit from ads will resolve naturally.
评论 #42421229 未加载
ChrisMarshallNY5 months ago
Ugh.<p>Any reason that they couldn&#x27;t add a basic text link, below the video, with &quot;Open In YouTube&quot; as the text?
评论 #42416775 未加载
评论 #42416723 未加载
评论 #42416795 未加载
jbaber5 months ago
This explains a mystery I only recently noticed.<p>If a site has preferred ads they&#x27;d like to show anyway, maybe it&#x27;s time for them to pay for hosting the video elsewhere.
评论 #42416712 未加载
Zealotux5 months ago
Is anyone else experiencing huge issues with Youtube on Firefox (MacOS) lately? The UI completely hangs for a few seconds, a restart of the browser helps, but I&#x27;ve disabled all extensions and it still hangs. Using the devtools it seems there&#x27;s a huge GC happening periodically blocking the JS thread, no idea why.
评论 #42417492 未加载
评论 #42417141 未加载
评论 #42417271 未加载
评论 #42417497 未加载
评论 #42417339 未加载
评论 #42417368 未加载
评论 #42417610 未加载
评论 #42492830 未加载
encody5 months ago
Wait, so the Verge is upset that the PfP player removed a link that would take the user to the video on YouTube. But if they use the normal YouTube player that has the link, the Verge gets less ad $. But the users who click the link would be watching on YouTube, where again, the Verge would be earning less ad $.<p>Am I understanding this correctly? Because it sounds like the Verge is complaining about a change that should net them marginally more(?) ad $ (and is to YouTube&#x27;s disadvantage) because a few readers complained, and they&#x27;re just trying to blame YouTube instead.<p>I&#x27;m confused.
评论 #42417753 未加载
评论 #42418335 未加载
FollowingTheDao5 months ago
Monopolistic greed! Thee companies have captured all of us and they have the ability not to not care about customer service anymore! Break them up!
评论 #42417053 未加载
评论 #42417144 未加载
NooneAtAll35 months ago
even without embeds, youtube keeps loading video but not the rest of UI (or sometimes the opposite) from time to time for me<p>and simple refresh doesn&#x27;t help - I have to ctrl+f5 to fix it
评论 #42416718 未加载
mabedan5 months ago
Makes sense from YouTube side. Why they would associate themselves with ads that has nothing to do with them?
评论 #42416835 未加载
评论 #42416767 未加载
评论 #42418043 未加载
xbmcuser5 months ago
Is it not normal web etiquette to link back to what you are using. I am not sure YouTube is in the wrong.
评论 #42416918 未加载
ChrisArchitect5 months ago
You can&#x27;t have it both ways or at least YouTube tried to help publishers out with the special player.<p>What&#x27;s the actual problem here: that Verge doesn&#x27;t like entitled ppl complaining to them about lack of links. Verge is trying to be one of those very publishers going independent etc, so support them, expect to &#x27;stay on site&#x27;, can&#x27;t have it both ways. (Unless Verge does the extra work <i>for the users</i> and adds a quick link under every vid)
评论 #42416953 未加载