TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Perplexity got ads

237 pointsby amrrs5 months ago

33 comments

pembrook5 months ago
Big surprise. It’s almost as if internet 1.0 shook out the way it did for a reason, and for all the complaining about ads, fast forward 25 years and consumers still fundamentally refuse to pay for search.<p>It’s the same reason the phone book was also free and ad supported pre-internet.<p>I don’t know why we can’t accept this reality and why we need to masochistically flog ourselves every time this is proven true over and over again.
评论 #42594433 未加载
评论 #42592396 未加载
评论 #42592579 未加载
评论 #42594400 未加载
评论 #42593965 未加载
评论 #42592368 未加载
评论 #42593424 未加载
评论 #42593456 未加载
评论 #42592571 未加载
评论 #42596815 未加载
评论 #42593495 未加载
评论 #42593384 未加载
评论 #42594474 未加载
rchaud5 months ago
Interesting that the ad is for TurboTax of all things.<p>As a non-user, would Perplexity attempt to answer the question of &quot;Why is TurboTax the best tax filing software?&quot; with a response that cites the many efforts TurboTax has made to block a free public alternative?<p>TurboTax’s fight against free tax filing - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=31072202">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=31072202</a>
评论 #42593828 未加载
评论 #42593316 未加载
评论 #42597808 未加载
nomilk5 months ago
What are the advantages of Perplexity over, say, ChatGPT?<p>I use three LLMs atm (ChatGPT, Claude, and Grok), and have a decent sense for which is better at different tasks. For example, when asked about questionable web scraping ChatGPT and Claude give answers regarding ethics, whereas Grok gives more direct, technical response.<p>What is Perplexity better than other LLMs at?
评论 #42592223 未加载
评论 #42593061 未加载
评论 #42592479 未加载
评论 #42592374 未加载
评论 #42596237 未加载
评论 #42592194 未加载
duckkg55 months ago
No surprise here, but what a bummer that this is &quot;The Way™&quot;<p>Just let me pay you $3-5&#x2F; month to never see an ad again. It&#x27;s worth it to me since the service is actually decent.
评论 #42590316 未加载
评论 #42591013 未加载
评论 #42591110 未加载
评论 #42592113 未加载
评论 #42590215 未加载
mikae15 months ago
Surprise! Companies eventually need to make some money.
评论 #42589979 未加载
评论 #42590181 未加载
评论 #42591097 未加载
评论 #42590051 未加载
评论 #42593324 未加载
评论 #42592152 未加载
评论 #42590406 未加载
talldayo5 months ago
I like how AI generated ads tacitly confirm that advertisement was never about exposure and introducing people to new things. No, it&#x27;s about automating deception on a grand scale and awarding the people that can most effectively control an audience.<p>Why <i>is</i> TurboTax the best way to file my taxes, anyways?
评论 #42590149 未加载
评论 #42591984 未加载
jtbayly4 months ago
This seems like a very dangerous play.<p>The selling point of these AIs is that they can give you accurate answers. Mixing up answers and ads like this seems like a recipe for loss of trust.<p>I know it’s the same thing that Google did with search results, but this seems different to me.<p>That question is obviously correctly answered by “It’s not. Here are several alternatives that are just as good and better and cheaper or even free, etc.” But we know that won’t be the answer.<p>So what is the result of typing that question directly? Is it different from the result of clicking the question as an ad? Can I get the right answer anymore? Will the interface show that the answer itself is an ad? Can I switch back to an un-“bribed to give me the wrong answer” interface?
behnamoh5 months ago
Makes me wonder if the lowering of prices in this industry is temporary. Currently, the API costs are at an all-time low, but how much of it is subsidized by investor money? Are we going to see increasing prices as the hype goes away and post-nut clarity kicks in the industry?
评论 #42601806 未加载
评论 #42590345 未加载
评论 #42590338 未加载
shadowvoxing5 months ago
I use you.com and it has the latest greatest LLMs with no ads.
评论 #42593073 未加载
评论 #42593102 未加载
评论 #42592841 未加载
brendoelfrendo5 months ago
This was announced in November: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.perplexity.ai&#x2F;hub&#x2F;blog&#x2F;why-we-re-experimenting-with-advertising" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.perplexity.ai&#x2F;hub&#x2F;blog&#x2F;why-we-re-experimenting-w...</a>
评论 #42596330 未加载
hcurtiss5 months ago
My wife and I both pay for Kagi Ultimate, which they&#x27;ve quietly developed as a Perplexity killer. Aggregates all the major LLMs and couples them with Kagi&#x27;s clean search results with citations. All with no ads, no bullshit. It&#x27;s the whole corporate mission. It&#x27;s awesome. I hope enough people are willing to pay to make Kagi successful.
评论 #42590057 未加载
TZubiri5 months ago
The thing about SEO for LLMs is that placing your business in an LLM organically is probably indistinguishable from actually being a good business and being recommended by people (or indistinguishable from faking reviews on google maps or yelp.)
评论 #42590546 未加载
评论 #42592750 未加载
int_19h5 months ago
Do these apply to their paid &quot;pro&quot; option?
yedava5 months ago
AI products will be speed running the last few decades of tech - make a compelling product, then add ads based on the prompt, then store prompts from each user and build psychological profiles, and finally manipulate AI output to maximize user susceptibility to part with their hard earned money. Bonus points if they can get the user addicted to their product.
评论 #42590851 未加载
评论 #42590656 未加载
评论 #42590321 未加载
评论 #42590491 未加载
评论 #42590956 未加载
hiohio4 months ago
I am the founder of <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;hika.fyi&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;hika.fyi&#x2F;</a>. In my view, Perplexity doesn&#x27;t truly grasp users&#x27; needs and appears to be in a rush to monetize from them.
Imnimo4 months ago
Setting aside the general question of Perplexity being an ad-supported service, I don&#x27;t like that it&#x27;s unclear exactly what the advertiser is sponsoring. Are they just paying for the suggested query to appear? Or do they also get a say in which sources the model uses to craft it&#x27;s answer? Or even get to preview and approve the model&#x27;s response?
评论 #42599555 未加载
submeta5 months ago
I pay for Perplexity (and for Anthropic and for OpenAI and lots of other services) just so I don’t see ads. I absolutely detest ads. That’s why I hardly use Google anymore because its results are polluted, both search results and images. The results are not authentic (anymore). So this is a very bad move by Perplexity.
crowdyriver5 months ago
Genuine question, more for soloentrepreneurs, but what if instead of adding ads from other companies, the perplexity company did other paid products?<p>Then they could put a few non disruptive ads for those into their main free product, and they would make much more sense.<p>I want to apply this strategy into my (yet non existent) future products.
r00tanon4 months ago
It&#x27;s a tough game for Perplexity as long as they use Google&#x27;s search, and with Google now providing &quot;AI Summaries,&quot; and with the whole ad ecosystem (invented by Google) designed to turn us into predictable consuming robots, what&#x27;s a pre-IPO company going to do? Fight the good fight and stick with a subscription model, or knuckle under and start sending us Google ads?<p>Sucks. I will say this though: as soon as I see ads in my Perplexity search results, I&#x27;m cancelling my paid subscription and simply going back to Google. Without any other differentiating feature set, why would I pay Perplexity?<p>RIP, Perplexity; it was good while it lasted.
评论 #42599532 未加载
schmorptron4 months ago
I&#x27;m conflicted on this. I use perplexity at the moment because they gave out a year of pro subscriptions, and it&#x27;s geuninely pretty useful since it is so heavily based on web results. The one gpt wrapper product that I&#x27;ve liked so far.<p>With the actual model producers now also adding web search, the question is how long they will survive and how much value they can realistically add. The third-party models are also nerfed with less context length, and also seem less capable overall when comparing sonnet on perplexity to sonnet in the claude interface.<p>It makes sense that when the massive funding runs out these companies won&#x27;t be able to offer free plans without ads or anything, still sucks.
评论 #42594498 未加载
npollock5 months ago
how long before the advertisers pressure model providers to &quot;fine-tune&quot; mentions of their competitors?
评论 #42590178 未加载
kmarc5 months ago
I accidentally (another story) bought Revolut Metal (yes, the international micropayment&#x2F;credit card provider) and besides other apps, I got a Perplexity pro subscription.<p>It works great, TBH, especially now that is &quot;free&quot; for me. I hope it won&#x27;t start including sponsored links.<p>(Another tool I use daily and came with this subscription, is NordVPN. So at the end I don&#x27;t mind that I accidentally clicked on the buy button)
astrodude4 months ago
A lot of non-tech people seem to be ok with Ads (e.g: Spotify&#x2F;Google). More than 1 Unskippable YT ad is where they draw the line
risyachka5 months ago
It’s ironic that most people have jobs in the first place thanks to ads but hate on ads every day.<p>Without ads the world would basically stop, they drive the businesses, each and every one.<p>It’s a necessary evil that will always be in most popular products, especially considering most people want to get all value for free.
评论 #42591752 未加载
评论 #42592039 未加载
aucisson_masque5 months ago
well it&#x27;s a company and no one is forced to use their product if they don&#x27;t like their business model.<p>Everyone knew they couldn&#x27;t keep being free for ever, and i believe it&#x27;s only a beginning. one sponsored result per prompt ain&#x27;t going to balance the expense.
评论 #42590466 未加载
amrrs5 months ago
fwiw - Aravind Srinivas (Perplexity cofounder) spoke about Ads - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=FWPmu_rKxJo" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=FWPmu_rKxJo</a>
评论 #42590014 未加载
Taylor_OD5 months ago
I noticed this when I was served an ad for the newish Venom movie. Add in TurboTax, and it seems like they really have no discretion about who they are willing to advertise for. That is worrisome.
deadbabe5 months ago
How will we know truth when there are no more unbiased AI left to ask?
Destiner5 months ago
perplexity is a great product, but it&#x27;s a feature, not the app.<p>they are in the middle — not really a lab, not really a consumer product.<p>i expect them to get acquired in the next year or so.
ericd5 months ago
Just a reminder that you can run a fairly capable model like qwen2.5:72b locally on an 128 gig M4 Max Macbook Pro.
评论 #42593527 未加载
评论 #42591743 未加载
评论 #42592007 未加载
abesan5 months ago
the good ol cycle of enshittification
plagiarist5 months ago
A large reason LLMs are useful for search and answering questions is because they omit the ads and (LLM-generated!) garbage listicles to give the searcher a straight answer. Ads are, by definition, worse for the searcher. If they were quality and strongly related to the query they would be organic results.<p>IMO it was always inevitable that companies will put the ads back in, removing this benefit. Perhaps the paid AI offerings will be able to continue focusing on quality results for the searchers.
评论 #42590106 未加载
robblack5 months ago
At least they labeled it lol
评论 #42593960 未加载
评论 #42592824 未加载