Typical case of CIA spreading propaganda to create civil unrest all around the world<p>Relevant:<p>"Come to the ‘war cry party’: How social media helped drive mayhem in Brazil<p>Researchers detected a surge in aggressive rhetoric from election denialists in far-right channels online ahead of Sunday’s rioting"<p><a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2023/01/08/brazil-bolsanaro-twitter-facebook/" rel="nofollow">https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2023/01/08/brazil-...</a><p>and<p><a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11562433/Facebook-riddled-ex-CIA-agents-ex-FBI-agents-work-Twitter.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11562433/Facebook-r...</a><p>and the classic:<p><a href="https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2022/09/myanmar-facebooks-systems-promoted-violence-against-rohingya-meta-owes-reparations-new-report/" rel="nofollow">https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2022/09/myanmar-faceb...</a>
> The government did not immediately clarify which aspects of Meta's policy might be illegal, but said the latest changes "could represent fertile ground for the violation of laws that protect fundamental rights of Brazilian citizens."<p>I hate this sort of authoritarian double speak. Expanding the speech you can say could violate fundamental rights?