> Do reasoning LLMs need their own Philosophical Language?<p>Do faster-than-light starships require strangelets? Like FTL travel, it's hard to say, because we don't have "reasoning LLMs" anyway.<p>What we have are LLMs that build out story-documents, in which we humans perceive a fictional computer-character with text forming an internal monologue, and those generated stories seem to be more cohesive than ones without the monologue.<p>That means approaching this from the perspective of good symbolic logic is a mistake, since LLM algorithms aren't designed to do that. Whatever qualities make for a "good" story-cohesion monologue will probably be something else.