I was looking to find a list of Subreddits blocking X links, but the title is misleading; the article only lists a random five. I'm sure there are more.
Remember:<p>If nine people are comfortable sitting down at a table to eat lunch with a Nazi, then there are ten Nazis at that table.<p>Of course, you could debate just how close Musk's views are to the tenants of National Socialism, but the point is that his rhetoric and actions closely mirror some of the more vile parts of that ideology and could encourage people to act in certain ways that are detrimental to the safety of certain groups.<p>I guess what I'm saying is, don't split hairs for justifying what has happened, and just delete your Twitter account.<p>EDIT:<p>Downvote me all you want; my grandfather didn't watch his countrymen get gunned down on Omaha beach from his US Navy ship for someone to throw Roman salutes at the inauguration of a President.
Does this intersect with the net neutrality debate? The FCC's net neutrality rules were focused on ISPs. But is there really a fundamental difference between an ISP and a big internet portal with respect to the value of neutrality?<p><pre><code> Net neutrality was designed to ensure that all data on the internet is treated equally by ISPs and governments, regardless of content, user, platform, application, or device. -- https://www.investopedia.com/terms/n/net-neutrality.asp
</code></pre>
Once it would have been considered easier to switch an ISP than a social network, and that justifies different treatment. But the network effect has often proven an insurmountable garden wall for social network users. It's not clear to me that it is logically or ethically consistent to regulate neutrality for one but not the other.