For those curious: This was most likely posted <i>because</i> it is gone. I don't think USAID's disappearance is a particularly good HN topic, but it's liable to just confuse people like this.<p>If this is a discussion we want to have, maybe a news article about it would be better? E.g. <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/01/politics/usaid-website-offline-freeze/index.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/01/politics/usaid-website-offlin...</a> -- which I haven't really read either, but it is probably less confusing.
For context<p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Agency_for_International_Development" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Agency_for_Inter...</a>
It gives me absolutely no joy to say it, but I am concerned the top people in Trumpocracy, notably Trump and Musk, might end up shot.<p>They are pissing off so many people, so quickly, so heavy-handedly, and in a country literally stuffed with guns.<p>One guy whose business exports are killed by retaliatory tariffs, or another whose medical care gets shut down, or someone with family in a developing country whose life ends up ruined by the US defaulting on its aid commitments. And it's barely two weeks in.<p>And yes, I know it's mostly the MAGA crowd who has guns, but they are half the country, and Trump doesn't seem to mind shooting with his eyes shut. Well, you're going to hit quite a few of your own people if you do that. Populist sentiment seems to run out when you hit people where it hurts - their wallet.<p>To be clear, the thought gives me no joy. Already being a US president is one of the most dangerous jobs in the world, and this would only set an awful precedent for whoever follows.
Through this I learned CISAs website runs on Drupal and that was much cooler to me than I thought it would be.<p>thought process (hmmm what other gov do I know? oh I'll curl up cisa. oh it uses drupal thats neat.)
Context: NYT, "End Appears Near for U.S. Aid Agency, Democratic Lawmakers Say" <a href="https://archive.is/qzRxa" rel="nofollow">https://archive.is/qzRxa</a>
See also perhaps "USAID security leaders on leave after trying to keep Musk’s DOGE from classified info, officials say":<p>> <i>WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump administration has placed two top security chiefs at the U.S. Agency for International Development on leave after they refused to turn over classified material in restricted areas to Elon Musk’s government-inspection teams, a current and a former U.S. official told The Associated Press on Sunday.</i><p>> <i>Members of Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency, known as DOGE, eventually did gain access Saturday to the aid agency’s classified information, which includes intelligence reports, the former official said.</i><p>> <i>Musk’s DOGE crew lacked high-enough security clearance to access that information, so the two USAID security officials — John Vorhees and deputy Brian McGill — were legally obligated to deny access.</i><p>* <a href="https://apnews.com/article/doge-musk-trump-classified-information-usaid-security-35101dee28a766e0d9705e0d47958611" rel="nofollow">https://apnews.com/article/doge-musk-trump-classified-inform...</a><p>* <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42910635">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42910635</a><p>I seem to remember some hullabaloo about Clinton not treating (potentially) classified e-mails appropriately.