TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

White House says it will cancel $8M in Politico subscriptions

18 pointsby donsupreme3 months ago

7 comments

afavour3 months ago
This is all just the dumbest knee jerk stuff.<p>Politico didn’t make payroll a couple of days ago for some technical reason or another. But because the timing coincided with Musk and his minions invading USAID conspiracy theories immediately popped up: Politico is bankrolled by USAID! It’s a psyop!<p>Of course the reality is incredibly boring. Politico sells PoliticoPro[1], “public affairs software”. The government (not USAID) was paying for that. Was it a good purchase? Are we getting value for money for it? No clue, but I’d bet the people that terminated the subscriptions don’t have a clue either. The hoarde demanded immediate action so action was taken.<p>My bet is they’ll quietly resubscribe in a few months.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.politicopro.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.politicopro.com&#x2F;</a>
legitster3 months ago
*Politico Pro, specifically: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.politicopro.com&#x2F;pro-features&#x2F;stakeholder-management&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.politicopro.com&#x2F;pro-features&#x2F;stakeholder-managem...</a><p>So lobbyists, consultants, and NGOs can still get access to the PR tool - just not the policymakers themselves.
croes3 months ago
Already debunked<p>&gt; USAID paid $44K to Politico, not over $8M as White House claimed. It was for subscriptions<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=42977622">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=42977622</a>
tamaharbor3 months ago
I think $8M is for a little more than “subscriptions”.
pentel-0_53 months ago
Without seeing the value delivered for the service, it seems kind of pricey at first blush unless it was paying for multiple individual analysts for N accounts to give them credible, researched expertise as a service. Maybe they were paying for a zillion individual subscriptions? If so, perhaps a site license for $1-2 million would be more reasonable. Don&#x27;t just throw things a way because the number is higher than X.
techapple3 months ago
Didn’t the CEO of the parent company of Politico recently call on all the executives to pray for president Trump?<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.rollingstone.com&#x2F;politics&#x2F;politics-news&#x2F;politico-owner-pray-for-trump-mathias-dopfner-axel-springer-1234587243&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.rollingstone.com&#x2F;politics&#x2F;politics-news&#x2F;politico...</a>
onetokeoverthe3 months ago
Plenty of gov related media. FCW, Government Executive, Aviation Leak. If there&#x27;s a dept budget for subs either cut it or not. Via Congress.<p>Congress decides on budgets in an democracy. But not in an idiocracy.<p>btw, both d and r teams are idiotic.