TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Tuta Launches Post Quantum Cryptography for Email (2024)

48 pointsby karlzt3 months ago

7 comments

Out_of_Characte3 months ago
What many miss is that updating your encryption algorithm <i>now</i> means decrypting all your previous data and then reencrypting it with the new algo. This is very expensive, time consuming and is something that you must do before encryption is broken or before your encrypted data is stored for later decryption.<p>This move, hopefully, promises to avoid this headache if the algo is actually post-quantum.
评论 #43173111 未加载
GrantMoyer3 months ago
Last time I checked, while tutanota&#x27;s emails are ostensibly E2E encrypted, all public keys are provided by their server and there&#x27;s no way to pin keys or verify them over a side channel, so a compromised server could trivially send its own public keys and MITM attack all encrypted emails.<p>This completely defeats the purpose and guarantees of E2E encryption, but for some reason, it hasn&#x27;t seemed to be a priority for them. The article passingly mentions key verification, so hopefully that&#x27;s changed.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;tutao&#x2F;tutanota&#x2F;issues&#x2F;768">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;tutao&#x2F;tutanota&#x2F;issues&#x2F;768</a>
评论 #43181900 未加载
mjl-3 months ago
I browsed through the article, but it&#x27;s not clear to me if they&#x27;re only encrypting data at rest (that you open up with a login session, but then: their referenced docs mention alice and bob exchanging messages, so that can&#x27;t be it), or that they&#x27;re encrypting messages and sending them out (i.e. it is similar to openpgp, but then their own custom thing? how would that interoperate with anyone else?).<p>Perhaps it makes more sense if you already know how they operate technically. There&#x27;s a chance I browsed too quickly and missed the explanation... The article reads a bit confusing with the mixing of (a)symmetric concepts.
评论 #43174873 未加载
timeflex3 months ago
I like Tuta but they are just not competitively priced. Proton purchased SimpleLogin &amp; their $4&#x2F;mo. premium plan includes unlimited aliases &amp; custom domains. Tuta charges €8&#x2F;mo. and you only get 30 aliases &amp; 500GB of storage. Just doesn&#x27;t make a lot of sense to me.
评论 #43174996 未加载
评论 #43181910 未加载
评论 #43171991 未加载
rob_c3 months ago
Given the massive bottlenecks that will likely remain in quantum for the next 10yr+ (Would love to see a change here obviously but c&#x27;est la vie)<p>I doubt anyone is blanket decrypting everyone&#x27;s email just to see what people had for lunch even if it&#x27;s &quot;only&quot; encrypted with rsa4096...
427728273 months ago
People who use this type of service, will you share your threat model? I am interested in the technology but have not had sufficient reason to make the jump from Fastmail.
评论 #43174850 未加载
imiric3 months ago
Whenever I hear the phrase &quot;post quantum&quot;, I associate it with snake oil. So this marketing article made me less likely to become a Tuta customer.
评论 #43170412 未加载
评论 #43169891 未加载
评论 #43171458 未加载
评论 #43178774 未加载
评论 #43170978 未加载
评论 #43170929 未加载