The lease mentioned in the article that concerns me more is the weather radar support facility in Norman. Last time I looked into weather data, prediction quality was much worse in the places where the WSR-88D radar coverage is spotty (the West, notably the Rockies) and the models have to rely on satellites and ground sensors; and it seems like Tornado Alley will totally get screwed if the long-range radars that can see wind start to fail?
This is about privatization of weather data, unsurpisingingly.<p>There has been a big industry push to lobby noaa out of existance, cause LEO satellite networks can sell lots more data if there's no noaa service.<p>Also - main customers are insurance providers, who need accurate forecasting for rate setting.<p>Edit for sources:
Federal Budget Cuts and Restructuring: The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), led by Elon Musk under the Trump administration, has initiated significant budget reductions and workforce downsizing across federal agencies, including NOAA. Reports indicate plans to cut approximately 50% of NOAA's workforce and reduce its budget by 30%, raising concerns about the potential privatization of weather services and the impact on public safety during extreme weather events. [1]<p>Project 2025 Initiative: The conservative policy blueprint known as Project 2025 proposes dismantling key components of NOAA, including the National Weather Service (NWS), and suggests privatizing weather forecasting services. Critics argue that such measures could undermine public access to essential weather data, leading to increased risks during natural disasters. [2,3,4]<p>AccuWeather's Lobbying Activities: AccuWeather has been reported to actively lobby for the privatization of weather services, aiming to limit public access to free NOAA data. Discussions highlight concerns that such privatization efforts could restrict the availability of critical weather information to the public. [4]<p>As a side note - I interviewed at a good number of weather satellite companies before my current role - it was a stated goal to "supplement noaa gaps in weather data" for "insurance & investment companies".<p>[1]<a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/federal-agencies-musk-doge-targeted-list-2025-2" rel="nofollow">https://www.businessinsider.com/federal-agencies-musk-doge-t...</a>
[2]<a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/oct/08/trump-project-2025-hurricanes" rel="nofollow">https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/oct/08/trump-projec...</a>
[3]<a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/weather/comments/1e5xacu/accuweather_is_actively_lobbying_to_privatize/" rel="nofollow">https://www.reddit.com/r/weather/comments/1e5xacu/accuweathe...</a>
[4]<a href="https://www.theverge.com/24279329/project-2025-tech-policy-guide-trump-admin" rel="nofollow">https://www.theverge.com/24279329/project-2025-tech-policy-g...</a>
Well if anything is true about Musk and his servant Trump, it is corruption and sending Federal Dollars to the top 1% is more important than people's lives.
Even though Russia and China own Elon and Trump, they should be against this. Every country, including them, relies on NOAA's weather data. I imagine the end result of this is Elon being granted a contract to provide weather data through his infrastructure much like this Sovereign Wealth Fund will be used to invest in Trump-allied companies. The entire thing is a big shakedown.