If all particles were entangled at the beginning of the universe (say, at t=0, the moment of the Big Bang), it could mean that the universe maintains some kind of deep, underlying connectivity. Quantum entanglement suggests that measuring one particle affects its entangled partner instantaneously, no matter how far apart they are. If everything was once entangled, then in some sense, everything remains fundamentally linked.<p>Could this also mean that there is a probaility that there is a god particle that can influence the entire universe?
Quantum entanglement means that the state of particles is distributed across space, making it non-local. This suggests that spacetime might not be necessary for managing these states, leading some scientists to explore the idea that spacetime could be an emergent property rather than a fundamental one. Since spacetime is a mathematical model and we haven't yet proven its existence, it makes sense that entanglement is non-local.<p>Regarding the idea of a particle entangled with every other particle in the universe, it's important to clarify that entanglement doesn't allow one particle to control the state of another. Entanglement means that the states of particles are correlated, but it doesn't imply any form of control or influence over the other particles. This is a common misconception, but current scientific understanding does not support the idea of a single particle controlling the universe through entanglement.
The whole universe is the “god particle”, let’s call it “universal potential, the totality of all.”<p>As for entanglement, entanglement breaks down through heat and interaction. Entanglement must be insulated and maintained (in mass) or it decays by environmental interference.<p>I’m fairly sure that entanglement is the synchronization of a hyperdimensional vibration, of which there are more unique vibrations than there are particles in the universe, so theoretically yet not practically, one might change the vibration like a radio dial and run across the entangled synchronization with the randomized vibrations of all other particles. You simply would never know if it were entangled with a random mote of dust drifting in the cosmic void, or otherwise.<p>This said, I also believe <i>not</i> being synchronized gives each particle a unique scope of identity. Thus it allows our minds to be subjectively our own (by default), and yes I propose that our minds entangle and may entangle.<p>Be glad no such correlation as you suggest exist, for fools always believe their wisdom is the extent of universality. There is always something more even great minds have not yet considered, and one may never know how existence may be manipulated for whose own interests.
Possible, but this has a very small chance. The current theories predict an amount of energy that was too high to for the quarks making the basic parts like protons or electrons. Only after the universe expanded the average energy was small enough that matter could exist.