TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Ask HN: Chrome sending new x-browser headers?

7 pointsby tom1337about 2 months ago
While digging around in webserver logs I noticed that Chrome 134 seems to have added new headers:<p><pre><code> &quot;x-browser-channel&quot;: &quot;stable&quot;, &quot;x-browser-copyright&quot;: &quot;Copyright 2025 Google LLC. All rights reserved.&quot;, &quot;x-browser-validation&quot;: &quot;wTKGXmLo+sPWz1JKKbFzUyHly1Q=&quot;, &quot;x-browser-year&quot;: &quot;2025&quot; </code></pre> The x-browser-validation value has been the same for all users I&#x27;ve observed. Does anybody have any idea what the validation header is doing? Haven&#x27;t found any info online nor with a (rather sloppy) search on the chromium source code. I find this combination of headers rather weird - why should a browser tell each web server who has the copyright on it and what update channel you&#x27;re on?

1 comment

ggmabout 2 months ago
the x-browser-validation string value being identical for all users tends to suggest it&#x27;s value is low to none. It feels like a misunderstanding of need and outcome. If its a super-encoded version string, well and good. It might be constructed over a shared secret and encode bitflags to capability or something but it looks like junk science or a misnamed field.<p>The copyright thing, there are different opinions about the need to assert (C) and it&#x27;s existence. If you were about to go into lawfare with e.g. Brave, then evidence of assertion would probably help when you came close to the steps of the court.<p>it&#x27;s not even immediately clear what they assert copyright over. The body of text sent as the HTTP header? Are they claiming intellectual property rights in the SPECIFIC set of type:values, or the value part only, or the type part only?
评论 #43477072 未加载