TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

With great sadness we announce the closing of Fluent.io

57 pointsby dhanjialmost 13 years ago

15 comments

jaysonelliotalmost 13 years ago
Am I the only one who would have liked a bit more detail behind the reason for Fluent shutting down after just six months?<p>I watched and waited with anticipation for the launch, and was excited when I got my invite and could start using the service.<p>It's a great product, with excellent UX and design, and while it still felt technically like a work in progress, I was ready to stick it out as a user and see where everything went.<p>Now, less than two months after getting my "golden ticket," it's all going away with a vague statement: <i>"We feel that we couldn’t keep running the service as it is, and now’s the time to move on."</i><p>Was there not enough runway to survive beyond six months? Did something else happen that they don't feel like discussing? If you're going to make announcements like "The future of email, brought to you by ex-Google people," it seems like you should at least know that you've got the funding to keep the lights on for more than a couple months.<p>It might seem like I'm being harsh on Fluent, considering that I'm just a user who didn't pay anything and shouldn't have any expectations. I'm not thinking about this as a user, though. I'm thinking about this as a would-be startup entrepreneur. One of the biggest barriers to getting traction early on is convincing users that you're going to stick around, that they can invest their time getting used to your product, even trust their data with you. After all, you're just some startup, maybe they should wait a year and see if you're still there. Meanwhile, you're stuck in a Catch 22, because you need those early adopters in order to still <i>be there</i> in a year.<p>When a startup makes big claims, then closes their doors mere months later, it puts another brick in the wall that makes it harder for other startups to make the case that it's worth getting on board for early adopters.<p>I'm sad to see Fluent go. It was a good idea, and seemed to be well executed. I just wish they'd be a bit more transparent about what happened, and why they weren't able to see this coming.
xqyzalmost 13 years ago
&#62; Email is quite clearly a thing that needs fixing<p>Honestly, I've never seen it that way. Email continues to work fine. It's platform independent and easy to use/setup. It's probably one of the best things on the internet ever.
评论 #4348625 未加载
评论 #4348671 未加载
waseemsadiqalmost 13 years ago
(I used to run my own cloud based e-mail aggregator www.inbox2.com)<p>The primary problem with these services is that they have to <i>pull</i> content and have to do it regularly. That means going and checking your inbox every 2-5 minutes to be able to provide a descent experience. Your ISP e-mail provider (or gmail etc) sit there and wait for e-mail to be sent to them making it less processing intensive (push based systems).<p>There are some techniques such as imap IDLE to make this a bit more efficient but 1. not every e-mail provider supports that and 2. for ex. with gmail idle caps at about 35K connections per box.<p>You could also have for ex. gmail forward all email to a custom address but average users generally found this very confusing and couldn't get this going.<p>We calculated that it cost us about <i>2 euros</i> per month to support a free user providing a 'good' user experience. Good luck making that back as paid service is also not a (scalable) option; the general consensus being: "email is supposed to be free" or "I am already paying for my gmail!".
cynicalmoodalmost 13 years ago
Its stuff like this that makes me very cynical about a big portion of the startup world. I admire companies that stick to their vision for the long haul and don't bow out because all of a sudden they don't have enough attention/passion/whatever. You'd think that if a party comes out stating huge ambitions and a big vision for fixing a problem, they'd have the determination to match the cause.
评论 #4348471 未加载
评论 #4348865 未加载
boyteralmost 13 years ago
I was not aware of Fluent but it looks fairly similar to about 100 or so other email sites, with a full list here <a href="http://blog.bartjellema.com/2012/02/22/email-startups/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.bartjellema.com/2012/02/22/email-startups/</a><p>Why are there so many of these sites? Is there a low barrier to entry or something? 90% seem to do similar things, so maybe someone should make one that allows people to write plugins for their platform and allow people to extend things that way?
评论 #4348717 未加载
DigitalSeaalmost 13 years ago
I guess when you go saying things like "the future of email" unless you're Google, Yahoo!, Microsoft or Facebook that's all it's ever going to be: words. From the limited glimpse I got to see of the service it looked pretty promising and very visually pleasing, but sadly without the funding ideas like this just can't and won't work.<p>I would like to see someone else take this idea and run with it because I think it's definitely something that is bound to happen, someone at some stage will make email better. I think the owners should open source the code on Github, it would be a shame for such a service to fall by the wayside all because the funding wasn't there.
评论 #4348490 未加载
nilsbungeralmost 13 years ago
Ay chance of open sourcing it? Maybe the community can carry the torch forward?
评论 #4348661 未加载
评论 #4348632 未加载
juliangamblealmost 13 years ago
@dhanji - thanks for all your work on this - you've inspired us all.<p>This post read a little bit like "This is more expensive to run in time and money than we thought - so we're shelving it for now."<p>Can I ask - was this move triggered by (a) Google buying Sparrow? (and thus shelving other email acquisition plans) (b) Marissa Mayer moving to Yahoo (and killing a potential purchaser strategy) (c) The release of outlook.com (creating a high speed competitor with lots of resources for distribution and support and marketing).
ozatamanalmost 13 years ago
The design looks quite nice, but having to share my private and work emails with yet another cloud provider was a no-deal for me.
jaequeryalmost 13 years ago
i'd like a premium email service where i pay for it. these days, i like spending money for products. i'd have paid for fluent.io.
评论 #4349110 未加载
评论 #4348956 未加载
imikayalmost 13 years ago
I think it is because Sparrow has just been acquired by Google.
评论 #4348934 未加载
kausikramalmost 13 years ago
Haven't heard much about fluent until now. It does seem to be a problem worth solving and 70,000 signups, does imply that it is a validated problem. Still coming out of the startups world, it feels eerie that a startup would shutdown within 6 months. Is this one more of those many cases, where the cofounders developed a solution for a valid problem, however failed to figure out how to monetize it?
ABSalmost 13 years ago
since someone is going to ask this I might as well be the first: why not try and sell it?
评论 #4348674 未加载
true_religionalmost 13 years ago
Has anyone else used Fluent.io?<p>I did, and found it wasn't quite for me. The interface left too much detail out, and I preferred GMail + Rapportive to do my emails.<p>Was there a mobile app that was better? I only used the web app.
lkrubneralmost 13 years ago
I feel that email needs fixing. I will explain my opinion by walking through my history with email, chronologically:<p>1994-1996 - used AOL. Proprietary format that can not be updated to anything modern.<p>1996-1998 - got a Geocities account. Geocities was later bought by Yahoo. Yahoo did a terrible job merging geocities usernames into the Yahoo username system, such that I was left with a strange, difficult to spell username, and the system sends email with one return email address when the message is original with me, but when I'm replying to an email sent by someone else, the return email address is different. Both email addresses go to my account, but my friends have often been confused about which my "real" email account is. And so have I. All the same, to this day, I still use this account in emergencies, when other email technologies have failed me. I hate, hate, hate the fact that so much of my "Sent" history is locked inside of this system.<p>1998 - an intense period of experimentation during which I tried 8 different email clients, many from very small 3rd parties, some of which only had a single developer, but some of which were famous among that crowd of tech elite who had been on the internet since the 1980s. All of these clients were later abandoned by their developers, or the company that owned the software went backrupt. There was one exception: Outlook Express.<p>1997-2000 - used Outlook Express. Downside was simply that it ran on Windows, and I was never happy being on Windows. Also, when I was ready to move to something else, I could not find any easy way to mass export my email, nor save it in some format other than eml.<p>2001-2007 the year before I had started renting my own server and keeping my email on my own server. In 2001 I switched to Linux as my main computer. After some experimentation, I settled down to using Thunderbird. My problem was that this client was incredibly buggy. At least on my Red Hat machine, and later on my Ubuntu machine, Thunderbird had many, many bugs and would often crash, causing me to lose a lot of work. Frustrated with Thunderbird, I would sometimes switch back to using my Geocities account, which I sort of hated, but which was more reliable.<p>2007-2009 - used Gmail, but hated having to rely on a 3rd party, and have also had privacy concerns with Google. Since 2000 I have preferred to rent my own server and keep my email on my own machine.<p>2010-2011 - used Pine. Also experimented with using Emacs as my main email client. I love Emacs, but decided I did not like it for email.<p>2011 - by 2010 I had sort of given up on Linux and switched to using a Mac as my main machine. Sometimes use the Mail.app for particular purposes, such as subscribing to various newsgroups. In general afraid of vendor lock-in and would prefer an open source solution. Mostly used Thunderbird. It is much less buggy than what I had to deal with years earlier on Linux. But still, it is somewhat buggy (sometimes search will stall, sometimes windows become non-responsive, and HTML quoting does not work well, which drives me crazy). It lacks some features that clients in the late 90s had, with the one big exception that it supports HTML email. However, I prefer to use plain text email, so that feature means nothing to me. When I try to use the HTML email, I run into numerous flaws that strike me as bugs: invisible barriers that will sometimes not allow the cursor to move up or down, when I'm using the arrow keys, or sections that won't allow themselves to be selected, or sections that can only be selected as a block. Drives me crazy.<p>It is 2012. I am unhappy with my email client. I would like something better, preferably open source.
评论 #4348694 未加载