TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Things I Won't Work With: Dioxygen Difluoride (2010)

271 pointsby PebblesRoxabout 2 months ago

33 comments

ChrisMarshallNYabout 2 months ago
<i>&gt; fluorine starts to dissociate into monoatomic radicals, thereby losing its gentle and forgiving nature. But that&#x27;s how you get it to react with oxygen to make a product that&#x27;s worse in pretty much every way.</i><p>That kind of prose is why I love reading this chap&#x27;s stuff.
评论 #43536670 未加载
评论 #43551308 未加载
stuartjohnson12about 2 months ago
&gt; Hangzhou Sage Chemical Company. They offer it in 100g, 500g, and 1 kilo amounts, which is interesting, because I don&#x27;t think a kilo of dioxygen difluoride has ever existed. Someone should call them on this - ask for the free shipping, and if they object, tell them Amazon offers it on this item. Serves &#x27;em right. Morons.<p>Gold
评论 #43537448 未加载
评论 #43539271 未加载
wiredfoolabout 2 months ago
Absolute classic of the genera<p><pre><code> At seven hundred freaking degrees, fluorine starts to dissociate into monoatomic radicals, thereby losing its gentle and forgiving nature. If the paper weren&#x27;t laid out in complete grammatical sentences and published in JACS, you&#x27;d swear it was the work of a violent lunatic.</code></pre>
perihelionsabout 2 months ago
Previously:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;hn.algolia.com&#x2F;?q=dioxygen%20difluoride" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;hn.algolia.com&#x2F;?q=dioxygen%20difluoride</a><p>And others in the series:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;hn.algolia.com&#x2F;?q=things%20won%27t%20work" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;hn.algolia.com&#x2F;?q=things%20won%27t%20work</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.science.org&#x2F;topic&#x2F;blog-category&#x2F;things-i-wont-work-with" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.science.org&#x2F;topic&#x2F;blog-category&#x2F;things-i-wont-wo...</a><p>High overlap with: (rocket fuels)<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;hn.algolia.com&#x2F;?q=ignition%20informal" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;hn.algolia.com&#x2F;?q=ignition%20informal</a>
评论 #43534775 未加载
评论 #43537980 未加载
IlikeKittiesabout 2 months ago
Not a Chemist but reminded me about this article: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;gizmodo.com&#x2F;chlorine-trifluoride-the-chemical-that-sets-fire-to-as-1715935811" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;gizmodo.com&#x2F;chlorine-trifluoride-the-chemical-that-s...</a><p>&gt; Just to get the ball rolling, here’s a few of the more unusual things chlorine trifluoride is known to set fire to on contact: glass, sand, asbestos, rust, concrete, people, pyrex, cloth, and the dreams of children…
评论 #43536141 未加载
评论 #43535822 未加载
评论 #43537422 未加载
评论 #43540158 未加载
jandrewrogersabout 2 months ago
One of the fun parts of chemistry is that most chemicals that ordinarily exist are quite far from having the most extreme possible properties that you can ascribe to a chemical. It doesn’t really matter what the property is. This is almost by definition, as “extreme properties” is roughly a synonym for “extremely unfavorable thermodynamics”.<p>Nonetheless, chemists are obsessed with these because in theory you can engineer chemicals with completely implausible, or at the very least counter-intuitive, properties in a lab if you can figure out how to do it. It is the equivalent of extreme performance-engineering geekery in software. You do it because you can, not necessarily because you have a use case.<p>Topics like “theoretical limits of high explosive power” [0] and a lot of other things that will put you on a government list are something chemists definitely geek out on.<p>[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Octanitrocubane" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Octanitrocubane</a>
GarnetFlorideabout 2 months ago
The Rocketdyne Tripropellant rocket had great specific impulse, one of the best. But-- there are many reasons it never caught on: one of the byproducts was FOOF, along with other things like hydrofluoric acid.
评论 #43537389 未加载
评论 #43535231 未加载
评论 #43536277 未加载
blantonlabout 2 months ago
This guy&#x27;s writing style makes him a worldwide treasure, and probably inspired a few young chemists.<p>I&#x27;ll always read and re-read his blog posts when they are posted here.
apiabout 2 months ago
I think there&#x27;s some stuff in a book called <i>Ignition</i> about experiments using Fluorine as an oxidizer in rocket engines to get a little better specific impulse than oxygen. Only problem is that the exhaust is hydrofluoric acid at thousands of degrees. Yipe.
评论 #43537155 未加载
评论 #43537065 未加载
评论 #43539062 未加载
评论 #43537147 未加载
relwinabout 2 months ago
YouTube chemists visit Dr. Kraus&#x27; fluorine lab in Germany: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;UzIH6raTxyE?si=74Pfn0i8Whq09Iim" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;UzIH6raTxyE?si=74Pfn0i8Whq09Iim</a>
rbanffyabout 2 months ago
I remember this article and I&#x27;m laughing before I even click the link. What a delightful read. Even more delightful I&#x27;ve never encountered this molecule.
RandomBaconabout 2 months ago
Bit rot: the article links to <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.lateralscience.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.lateralscience.co.uk</a> which is now just an advertisement for online gambling.
评论 #43538288 未加载
sortalongoabout 2 months ago
&gt; 433 kcal&#x2F;mole<p>For reference, TNT is 1kcal&#x2F;g. This is 6.2 kcal&#x2F;g.
评论 #43539948 未加载
ubermonkeyabout 2 months ago
There are two kinds of popular reposts in the world.<p>Most are Type 1, which is &quot;meh, this again&quot; followed by a scroll away.<p>This is an excellent example of Type 2, which is &quot;Oh boy! I get to read this again!&quot;<p>(See also: the SR71 speed check story; the story of Mel, the Real Programmer; etc.)
评论 #43536760 未加载
评论 #43538450 未加载
ourmandaveabout 2 months ago
Dioxygen Difluoride<p>That both words start with DIe! is enough to warn me off.
评论 #43535659 未加载
tverbeureabout 2 months ago
I will always reread the story about Satan&#x27;s Kimchi.
__MatrixMan__about 2 months ago
In case you weren&#x27;t dissuaded by the article, here&#x27;s the synthesis procedure that it starts off by referencing: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;sci-hub.st&#x2F;https:&#x2F;&#x2F;doi.org&#x2F;10.1016&#x2F;S0022-1139(00)80341-3" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;sci-hub.st&#x2F;https:&#x2F;&#x2F;doi.org&#x2F;10.1016&#x2F;S0022-1139(00)803...</a>
mouse_about 2 months ago
I clicked that permalink to lateral science (&quot;Blown up or poisoned&quot;) and unfortunately the website appears to be hacked. :(
评论 #43535108 未加载
评论 #43543479 未加载
bovermyerabout 2 months ago
I wonder if you can still order a kilo of &quot;Satan&#x27;s kimchi&quot; from that supplier in China. If you ever could.
评论 #43535237 未加载
评论 #43549377 未加载
narratorabout 2 months ago
A. G. Streng would probably have been forgotten about like so many if he hadn&#x27;t been such a risk taking experimental chemist. Now someone&#x27;s probably going to make a movie or comic book about him.
tonetegeatinstabout 2 months ago
Have already read this before and was interesting.<p>I did some research and inquiry and found out you can in fact get florine gas....and they can even compress it in tanks if you want.
credit_guyabout 2 months ago
Derek Lowe would never work with it, but this wikipedia page [1] lists 4 rocket propellant choices that contain F2O2 as the oxydizer.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Liquid_rocket_propellant#Bipropellants" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Liquid_rocket_propellant#Bipro...</a>
评论 #43544472 未加载
shadowgovtabout 2 months ago
Ah, good ol&#x27; FOOF: the chemical with the convenient name-synchronicity to what it will do to you!
评论 #43536122 未加载
评论 #43536073 未加载
pixl97about 2 months ago
Ah yes, FOOF. The last sound you hear before you melt, explode, blow up, and disassociate at a molecular level.
评论 #43539092 未加载
speckxabout 2 months ago
Relevant <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;what-if.xkcd.com&#x2F;40&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;what-if.xkcd.com&#x2F;40&#x2F;</a>
cpercivaabout 2 months ago
FOOF, not to be confused with F00F (a bug in the Pentium which allowed unprivileged processes to lock up the system): <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.m.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Pentium_F00F_bug" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.m.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Pentium_F00F_bug</a>
mmonaghanabout 2 months ago
I love Derek Lowe&#x27;s writing. I think I&#x27;ve read most of his articles but this series is my favorite.
stuaxoabout 2 months ago
2010 being 15 years ago is making me feel pretty ancient.
stackedinserterabout 2 months ago
FOOF-sulfur rocket engine would be fun.
评论 #43536871 未加载
pazimzadehabout 2 months ago
hopefully this isn&#x27;t trending because of the recent controversy about fluoride in tap water?
philipwhiukabout 2 months ago
Good old FOOF
评论 #43536874 未加载
tim333about 2 months ago
The article is good stuff. It&#x27;s a shame he&#x27;s now having to be writing Crisis, Part IX etc about the Trump admin trying to trash things. (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=43418192">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=43418192</a>)
cwilluabout 2 months ago
FOOF, not to be confused with the FLOOF&#x27;s that <i>everyone</i> wants to work with