TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Reinventing Feathering for the Vectorian Era

70 pointsby interpol_pabout 2 months ago

6 comments

tobrabout 1 month ago
Right about when I’d expect it to get into the interesting technical details, the article pivots to marketing fluff. Hoping for a follow-up that dives in.
rikrootsabout 1 month ago
You can achieve a gaussian blur effect using an infinite impulse response thing[1]. Some very clever people at IBM came up with the idea, and some other very clever people translated that code to Javascript and stuck it on GitHub for the rest of the world to use[2].<p>[1] - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Infinite_impulse_response" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Infinite_impulse_response</a><p>[2] - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;nodeca&#x2F;glur">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;nodeca&#x2F;glur</a>
cjbgkaghabout 1 month ago
The 2D Gaussian blur is separable into 2 1D convolutions which is much faster than the 2D version so less of a performance issue.
评论 #43607055 未加载
ajbabout 1 month ago
Not completely buying this. He&#x27;s claiming that it&#x27;s better to do vector based feathering, but it&#x27;s not at all clear that his approach isn&#x27;t just as computationally expensive, or more. Filters do require a lot of calculations, but they are embarrassingly parallel and also you get help from the Convolution Theorem.
评论 #43614517 未加载
B1FF_PSUVMabout 1 month ago
I&#x27;m a bad person who read too many old comics - I thought this was a V<i>i</i>ctorian history snippet about tar-less &quot;tarring &amp; feathering&quot;, perhaps with honey for a gourmet twist ...
评论 #43612678 未加载
zokierabout 1 month ago
I&#x27;m confused, can&#x27;t you accomplish the same effect with simple gradient (+ offset)?
评论 #43609316 未加载