TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Google will let companies run Gemini models in their own data centers

509 pointsby jonbaerabout 1 month ago

17 comments

djoldmanabout 1 month ago
Google announcement:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;cloud.google.com&#x2F;blog&#x2F;products&#x2F;ai-machine-learning&#x2F;run-gemini-and-ai-on-prem-with-google-distributed-cloud" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;cloud.google.com&#x2F;blog&#x2F;products&#x2F;ai-machine-learning&#x2F;r...</a>
评论 #43664572 未加载
评论 #43668885 未加载
rwmjabout 1 month ago
A bit thin on detail, but will this require confidential VMs with encrypted GPUs? (And I wonder how long before someone cracks SEV-SNP and TDX and pirate copies escape into the wild.)
评论 #43663071 未加载
评论 #43662560 未加载
评论 #43663727 未加载
评论 #43664502 未加载
评论 #43662711 未加载
nsrivabout 1 month ago
This might be a great way for them to strengthen their model through federated learning.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;federated.withgoogle.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;federated.withgoogle.com&#x2F;</a>
评论 #43667978 未加载
评论 #43667813 未加载
holografixabout 1 month ago
This is obvious government contract baiting. Kudos though they might actually move some Google Distributed Cloud this way
评论 #43665641 未加载
评论 #43663750 未加载
评论 #43664216 未加载
评论 #43665413 未加载
_cs2017_about 1 month ago
Curious if this was forced on Google Cloud by Sundar, or was it something that Google Cloud as an org wanted to do?<p>At first glance, it seems Google Cloud might lose some revenue from customers who can now deploy Gemini in-house. On the other hand, it&#x27;s not a complete loss, since presumably Google Cloud is still involved in providing some underlying tech? Not to mention, some customers would never consider using off-premises setup anyway.
评论 #43668489 未加载
throwaway48476about 1 month ago
Like you can with deep seek? Or will it be more complicated and expensive. I don&#x27;t know who would actually want that.
评论 #43664901 未加载
评论 #43665224 未加载
tzikiabout 1 month ago
I don&#x27;t understand how Google is willing to do this but won&#x27;t sell TPUs to other days centers. It should be obvious from Nvidia&#x27;s market cap that they&#x27;re missing a huge opportunity.
评论 #43666592 未加载
aussieguy1234about 1 month ago
What is the risk that some hacker could exfliltrate the weights?
评论 #43664772 未加载
评论 #43666288 未加载
rr808about 1 month ago
I work for a bank and we&#x27;re banned from using AI because of the privacy problem. I&#x27;d think there is a big market for a product like this.
miohtamaabout 1 month ago
Is Gemini tied&#x2F;benefitting from Google TPU hardware? Because you need hardware in the data center to run this, and I feel it is somewhat specialised.
评论 #43663334 未加载
评论 #43666251 未加载
评论 #43666451 未加载
评论 #43667761 未加载
评论 #43663258 未加载
评论 #43663275 未加载
bushbabaabout 1 month ago
Reminds me of the Google search appliance.
评论 #43668169 未加载
jaggsabout 1 month ago
Not a cat&#x27;s chance in hell that any eu organisation will rush to this offer right now. Or maybe ever in fact.
评论 #43666306 未加载
ein0pabout 1 month ago
What a sudden change of heart. Thank you, DeepSeek!
repleteabout 1 month ago
Google AI rackmount appliance coming soon?
blitzarabout 1 month ago
Is The Gavin Belson Signature Edition Box is needed to run these?
评论 #43663307 未加载
评论 #43667413 未加载
评论 #43663319 未加载
评论 #43663015 未加载
评论 #43663232 未加载
评论 #43664217 未加载
评论 #43664811 未加载
评论 #43665006 未加载
评论 #43667287 未加载
评论 #43665200 未加载
ameliusabout 1 month ago
It&#x27;s still an advertising company you&#x27;re doing business with.<p>I mean, would you buy cookies from a brand that is known for producing rodenticides?
评论 #43663983 未加载
评论 #43665698 未加载
评论 #43663762 未加载
fxtentacleabout 1 month ago
I believe these are pure word tricks to suggest privacy without actually delivering it.<p>As context, you need to remember that Google deleted their &quot;Don&#x27;t Be Evil&quot; motto and became a defense contractor. The customer will most likely receive a black box owned and set up by Google. That means they have no way of knowing if the system inside is phoning home or being remote controlled by an US government agency, or not. You can then say that the model is hosted in your own data center, which might make some people feel good, but using it with personal information is still a violation of the GDPR.<p>If Google, however, would make these boxes fully offline capable and I was also allowed to wipe all hard disks myself before returning it, that would convince me of their good intentions.
评论 #43665209 未加载
评论 #43662964 未加载
评论 #43662844 未加载
评论 #43664604 未加载
评论 #43662850 未加载
评论 #43666322 未加载