TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Benn Jordan's AI poison pill and the weird world of adversarial noise

132 pointsby glitcherabout 1 month ago

9 comments

Imnimoabout 1 month ago
Any new &quot;defense&quot; that claims to use adversarial perturbations to undermine GenAI training should have to explain why this paper does not apply to their technique: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;arxiv.org&#x2F;pdf&#x2F;2406.12027" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;arxiv.org&#x2F;pdf&#x2F;2406.12027</a><p>The answer is, almost unfailingly, &quot;this paper applies perfectly to our technique because we are just rehashing the same ideas on new modalities&quot;. If you believe it&#x27;s unethical for GenAI models to train on people&#x27;s music, isn&#x27;t is also unethical to trick those people into posting their music online with a fake &quot;defense&quot; that won&#x27;t actually protect them?
评论 #43697030 未加载
评论 #43699829 未加载
评论 #43695979 未加载
评论 #43696813 未加载
评论 #43695965 未加载
评论 #43695984 未加载
janalsncmabout 1 month ago
I like Benn Jordan because he’s clearly got a grasp on a functional understanding of machine learning, but that’s not his primary background. He comes from a music production background, so his focus is more practical and results-oriented.<p>It will be really interesting as this knowledge percolates into more and more fields, what domain experts do with it. I see ML as more of a bag of tricks that can be applied to many fields.
评论 #43695851 未加载
rcarmoabout 1 month ago
Benn is one of my fave subscriptions on YouTube--both for the (now more occasional) music gear stuff and for the in-depth music industry education. The fact that he has been hacking away at IP and AI stuff for ages is just icing on the cake.
propter_hocabout 1 month ago
Benn has been one of my favorite electronic composers for almost 20 years. Probably my favorite track of his:<p>The Flashbulb - Parkways: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;C6pzg7I61FI" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;C6pzg7I61FI</a>
dale_glassabout 1 month ago
All this stuff is snake oil, either already, or eventually.<p>There&#x27;s new models showing up regularly. Civitai recognizes 33 image models at this point, and audio will also see multiple developments. Any successful attack on a model isn&#x27;t guaranteed to apply to another one, not even yet invented. There&#x27;s also a multitude of possible pre-processing methods and their combinations for any piece of media.<p>There&#x27;s also the difficulty of attacking a system that&#x27;s not well documented. Not every model out there is open source and available for deep analysis.<p>And it&#x27;s hard to attack something that doesn&#x27;t yet exist, which means countermeasures will come up only after a model was already successfully created. This is I&#x27;m sure of some academic interest, but the practical benefits seem approximately none.<p>Since information is trivially stored, anyone having any trouble could just download the file today and sit on it for a year or two not doing anything at all, just waiting for a new model to show up.
评论 #43696836 未加载
thomastjefferyabout 1 month ago
The problem is that copyright is the law of the land, and it <i>demands</i> our participation.<p>Because of that reality, every artist who wants to make money must either participate in it, or completely isolate themselves from it.<p>These models have become an incredible opportunity for giant corporations to circumvent the law. By training a model on a copyrighted work, you can <i>launder</i> that work into your own new work, and make money from it without sharing that money with the original artists. Obviously, this is an incredibly immoral end to copyright as we know it.<p>So what are we going to do about this situation? Are we really going to keep pretending that copyright can work? It wasn&#x27;t even working <i>before</i> all the AI hype! Ever heard the words &quot;starving artist&quot;? <i>Of course you have!</i><p>We need a better system than copyright. I&#x27;m convinced that no system at all (anarchy) would be a superior option at this point. If not now, then when?
评论 #43696499 未加载
评论 #43696417 未加载
KennyBlankenabout 1 month ago
Why did you link to blogspam and not the original video?<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=xMYm2d9bmEA" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=xMYm2d9bmEA</a>
评论 #43695878 未加载
评论 #43695782 未加载
whimsicalismabout 1 month ago
adversarial noise is very popular in the media but imo is a complete dead end for the desired goals - representations do not transfer between different models this easily
评论 #43695750 未加载
constantcryingabout 1 month ago
IP is such a stupid concept. How does it make any sense of that an artist could own the right to let people <i>learn</i> from his music. The idea of an artist getting to choose who can and can&#x27;t learn from their song is so patently absurd.<p>I hope that the adversarial attacks can be easily detected and circumvented, just like other IP protection measures have been subverted successfully.
评论 #43695814 未加载
评论 #43695718 未加载
评论 #43698666 未加载
评论 #43695713 未加载
评论 #43698023 未加载
评论 #43696057 未加载
评论 #43695716 未加载
评论 #43695888 未加载
评论 #43696390 未加载
评论 #43698139 未加载
评论 #43695872 未加载
评论 #43695752 未加载
评论 #43695682 未加载
评论 #43695685 未加载