As the title implies, the article is 100% devoted to dishing dirt on Mr. T. & Co.<p>It'd have been nice if the article noted how many big (bad) changes has been announced by the White House...then reversed course on. Generally after serious pushback, or (presumed) grown-ups pointing out the major downsides of the change.<p>The article might even have suggested things which readers could physically do, if they cared to add to the pushback.<p>Trump or no Trump - if both the citizens' and journalists' ideal for "citizen participation", when things are going badly wrong, amounts to "keep clicking on articles and quietly emoting over those" ... well, then you don't have much of a democracy.