The intro video makes it sound multiple times like he wants creatives to use the music with absolutely no strings or restrictions, but the most basic uses like a Youtube video or indie film would require manually applying for a license where half the revenue goes to Mobygratis let alone the restrictions based on Moby’s political and dietary preferences.<p>He’s certainly free to license his music however he wants but he’s really overselling how permissive it is.
Really interesting to think about what would constitute commercial use in this day and age. If someone makes the track and puts it on YouTube and there happens to be ads… apparently 51% has to go to Moby. it is cool that anyone could just download and go. But I wonder if a lot of bedroom producers are just going to accept the terms without actually reading them, and not realize, based on the introductory video, that they have to do a profit share if they monetize in anyway. I do think he should've mentioned the profit share in his video.
I wish they could have used standard creative commons licenses. It took me some time to find that the tracks can't be used commercially without per-track licensing conversations.
I don't care that the license is non-commercial.<p>The collection is great. It's like a much more polished and professional version of my ideas folder (I rarely get beyond the initial loop/riff stage). Will now download a random piece, pop it into my DAW and see if it can inspire me to create something new.
Crazy and over-complicated license, better have a look at it: <a href="https://freemusicarchive.org/home" rel="nofollow">https://freemusicarchive.org/home</a>
I think for media/assets, CC-BY is the equivalent of MIT/BSD for source, and CC-BY-SA similar to a GPL. Anything more restrictive than that (e.g., "NC") wouldn't really qualify as "free". The licensing in this case seems to have too many strings attached.
All I wanted to do was play a sample of one randomly selected track.<p>Clicking the play button doesn't do that, it brings up a somewhat eccentric 2-line license agreement.<p>Clicking the checkmark to agree then prompts for your email address and to create an account.<p>These are dark UI patterns, and it's a shame a website purporting to be about generously sharing free content uses them. A button should do what it advertises.<p>Here's a snippet from the full license text if anyone's curious:<p><i>Moby does not permit his Tracks to be used to advertise right-wing politics or causes, or to be used to promote meat, dairy, or other animal products. People may disagree about when these lines have been crossed—which is why Moby retains the right to terminate the license to any Track completely at his sole and absolute discretion, at any time.</i><p>Also note you're contracting with a corporation, and the agreement includes a clause about you indemnifying them.
>there are only 2 things you can't do with the music here; use it to advertise right wing politics or causes, or use it to promote meat, dairy, or other animal products. click here to view the full terms.<p>I'm very liberal, but this is bizarre. Apart of a society is doing business with people who don't 100% agree with you.<p>And Bob's Burritos can't run an ad with it because they aren't a vegan restaurant ?<p>I'm lumped in with the Republicans because I like burgers and pizza? Is that where the culture war is at?
Hmm, generating royalty-free music on Suno, or getting involved with some pompous dude who strokes out at the sight of someone eating a burger and demands 51% for his "no strings attached" stuff that's 20 years old? Tough choice.
Sounds like he's interested in people listening to the music while creating. Maybe also using it as inspiration for their own music.<p>He's not supplying it as a stock sounds library.<p>Eh. Some of his music I like, some, not so much. I'll give it a listen.<p>I don't listen to music while I code. The only time I listen to music, is my daily exercise in the morning. This may be good for that.<p>Might use it as background music for some presentations. I don't vlog; which seems to be where a lot of stock music is used.
Too much politics involved for my taste.<p>It seems that I can't use it to promote Slavic content, because Slavic as a tradition can be right-wing in Moby's world.<p>If you're a content creator, I don't think going into this rabbit hole is worth it.
> "Moby does not permit his Tracks to be used to advertise right-wing politics or causes, or to be used to promote meat, dairy, or other animal products. People may disagree about when these lines have been crossed—which is why Moby retains the right to terminate the license to any Track completely at his sole and absolute discretion, at any time."
Is this a joke? No one is going to use this. This "music" was content slop ai music before content slop ai music- so people will just use real content slop ai music.