Between NIH grant-making being slowed down and this, there is no way to interpret these moves than being an underhanded way of causing university research infrastructure to collapse. Consider also, for example, that one Friday last month there was an announcement that indirect rates being cut to 15% for Dept. of Energy grants.. but <i>only</i> for universities, not companies or national labs!<p>Just from a steady state picture there is now significantly less funding flowing to America's research institutions and institutes. At some point buildings will be shut down, infrastructure mothballed and a generation of scientists will simply not be trained.<p>An adversary could not ask for a better outcome.
the "updates on priorities" page on NSF's web site is deeply dystopian: <a href="https://www.nsf.gov/updates-on-priorities" rel="nofollow">https://www.nsf.gov/updates-on-priorities</a>
> <i>...screen grant proposals for “topics or activities that may not be in alignment with agency priorities”</i><p>The only priorities the Trump administration has is in enforcing their myopic right-wing worldview and continuing their Manchurian Candidate destruction of our future by crippling science and education, and alienating the best and brightest people from around the world to make sure they don't come here to live and work, or leave as soon as possible.<p>We're going to be paying the price for this administration's actions for decades, if not for the rest of our country's existence.<p>(If you think this is too political for HN, or an over-reaction, remember that's what you said before the election as well. We weren't wrong then, and we're not wrong now.)
But we have AGI? We will have an intelligence super explosion by 2027 and a country of super geniuses just sitting around waiting for your command to "solve death" in 3 years after that.
/s<p>Hopefully more forward thinking developed and developing countries can step up and resurrect the US model that made it so successful and lure top talent to their more welcoming shores.