TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Less meat is nearly always better than sustainable meat

25 pointsby sohkamyung2 days ago

6 comments

zvmaz2 days ago
Less meat means less sentient beings suffering.
评论 #43985589 未加载
评论 #43980053 未加载
uslic001about 19 hours ago
As a gastroenterologist for over 30 years the healthiest patients I see are either on carnivore or paleo diet. The sickest patients are the vegans. This article does not agree with my experience.
throwaway4224322 days ago
The land cattle is often raised on is unsuitable for anything else. Poor soil, unpredictable rainfall that can fluctuate between drought and flooding.<p>Some Australian outback cattle stations may cover millions of hectares, but you&#x27;re not going to be able to grow anything else out there: too hot and little water and unlike cattle you can&#x27;t move your pea farm to where the water is.<p>I would agree that land-clearing (cutting down forests) to raise cattle is unacceptable, as are the use of feed-lots, but I would disagree that we need to eat less meat, and I would personally never give up my grass-fed organic beef.
评论 #43985751 未加载
评论 #43980484 未加载
评论 #43983211 未加载
baggy_trough2 days ago
Better from the perspective of carbon emissions, but that isn&#x27;t everything.
评论 #43979561 未加载
评论 #43979664 未加载
评论 #43979534 未加载
epistasis2 days ago
For people in the US, food emissions are almost a rounding error compared to other categories, such as transportation.<p>Both cars and meat are huge cultural lighting rods, and focusing on them for climate action has high risk, but focusing on meat as climate action is high risk with very few climate gains.
评论 #43979642 未加载
评论 #43979601 未加载
评论 #43979755 未加载
bethekidyouwant2 days ago
25% of people are anaemic
评论 #43985653 未加载