Apollo 11’s original landing spot was deemed not ideal, and was manually overridden by the human looking at the situation in situ. It becomes even more dramatic because it used up way more fuel depleting the padding. The original spot was decided based on imagery too. It feels like hubris to think that interpreting imagery alone is sufficient.<p>Looking at the Mars mission where they just toss the payload essentially wrapped in bubble wrap seems like a higher chance of success than something much more precise with landing legs. If there’s no soft squishy meat bags on board, why spend so much effort/risk on trying to land on legs requiring a this end up situation?