TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Nasa faked a shuttle image.

32 pointsby muonover 16 years ago

12 comments

ojbyrneover 16 years ago
It's a fairly common photographic technique to splice together multiple different exposures of the same shot. Yes, technically faked, but common.
评论 #458091 未加载
eliover 16 years ago
Satire is a difficult art to master. Doubly so on the Internet.
评论 #458199 未加载
Keyframeover 16 years ago
I never thought of it as a real shot - it looked as a promo shot with nice lighting from the start, why all the fuss?
评论 #459359 未加载
sam_in_nycover 16 years ago
This was on Reddit a couple of days ago and people pointed this out. This is about the hundredth time I've seen a link get tossed around, and then a blog post that regurgitates things already remarked upon from various discussions...<p>Someone might as well start a blog that just does exactly that... browser for URLs and read comments from Reddit, then create blog posts reposting the URL and rewording the most popular comments. Probably would get a lot of traffic, especially if done quickly before the link gets tossed from Reddit to Digg et al... then the blog could submit itself to Digg et al, and get traffic because the link has already proven itself to be valuable (and comments presumably add more value to the URL).<p>I've often thought about taking advantage of this "popular URL" arbitrage: links get popular within days of each other across Reddit, Digg, et al... why not automate this for one's benefit? Aggregate links from Reddit, Digg, et al and figure out where the link has been "underrated." If the link has tons of upmods on Reddit and has not yet been submitted to Digg, for example, you have yourself a winner. Just create a blog post about that URL, rephrase some popular Reddit comments, submit to Digg, and profit from the traffic.
tptacekover 16 years ago
Those aren't stars. Those are dead bugs.
bmeltonover 16 years ago
Mostly offtopic, but I thought I'd share the "NASA Water on Mars" picture for those who hadn't seen it:<p><a href="http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/image/0504/WaterOnMars2_gcc_big.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/image/0504/WaterOnMars2_gcc_big.jp...</a>
评论 #458288 未加载
notaddictedover 16 years ago
I took a quick look at this yesterday. I was not aware that this was supposed to be real, it looks like a rendering to me. If it is real... ummm shouldn't someone be driving the boat?
评论 #458177 未加载
评论 #458191 未加载
tsallyover 16 years ago
Too many people believe that NASA is fake for this to be funny :-p.
nazgulnarsilover 16 years ago
It's true. I've never seen a NASA. Has anyone? I'm inclined to believe that they don't exist.
DanielBMarkhamover 16 years ago
You know, they could have shot it using High Dynamic Range (HDR) techniques as well.<p>Of course, there would be other tell-tale signs then, like flaring or clumping. But at least it wouldn't be a composite.
TweedHeadsover 16 years ago
Fake, it doesn't have a wheel. How are you supposed to drive that space truck?
评论 #458181 未加载
weegeeover 16 years ago
that guy is a crackpot. it's a great image, who cares if its been enhanced. kids probably love it, and they need kids to love NASA.
评论 #459788 未加载