Full text PDF <a href="http://ernstchan.com.nyud.net/fefe/src/1346163651220.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://ernstchan.com.nyud.net/fefe/src/1346163651220.pdf</a><p>Actual title is "Persistent cannabis users show neuropsychological decline from childhood to midlife".
Realistically, whats the chance you can get a statistically significant result in the very hostile environment that surrounds cannabis use from such a very broad study?<p>They couldn't closely control the purity, variety or frequency of cannabis use. They obviously can't control for social stigma.<p>I guess this is just my general displeasure at articles fishing for correlations in a sea of bad data, longing for that resolving barrier of "statistical significance".
This definitely echoes my own observations. Due to various circumstances, in my life I have so far been thoroughly exposed to numerous, unconnected groups of drug users – all of which were smoking weed more or less regularly, and almost all of which were losers.
I am very happy to find out about this study, and I hope it receives an adequate exposure.
Let's see who funded the study: (* added for emphasis)
"This research received support from UK Medical Research
Council Grants G0100527 and MR/K00381X/1, US National Institute on Aging
Grant AG032282, US National Institute of Mental Health Grant MH077874,
and <i>US National Institute on Drug Abuse</i><i></i><i></i><i></i><i></i>* Grant P30 DA023026. Additional
support was provided by the Jacobs Foundation."<p>I agree adolescents probably shouldn't partake, but for adults, there's far worse things.
So wait, let me get this straight. Using cannabis irregularly means that I will lose about one IQ point by the time I hit middle age? If there was ever a reason to smoke up!