TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Ask HN: which way to go for bulk image uploading?

7 pointsby dpeqover 16 years ago
currently working on a photography-related project, I need a robust solution for bulk image uploads. After dabbling with a commercial solution called MultiPowUpload I ran into serious problems when uploading from a Mac. Eventually I found out, that these problems are not limited to this uploader but seem to occur with most flash-based uploaders together with flash player v.10.<p>The alternative would be something like the Aurigma software (you probably know it from Facebook and some other big sites) but I'm hesitant, because it requires an ActiveX- or Java install from the user. On the other hand it offers to resize files on the client side, allowing faster uploads and saving quite some bandwidth.<p>I also hat a look at SWFUpload, which lets you control almost every aspect of the uploader and even has Javascript callbacks on all events. But it looks a bit complicated and before I dive into that, I would like to hear your advice: which way would you go to build a robust bulk upload solution for your website?

3 comments

bl00mover 16 years ago
Millions of Facebook users indicate that it might work with ActiveX/Java (tho I don't find it cool either). You're also inclined to trust a big and established site more when it comes to installing software on your computer.
jupiterover 16 years ago
You cannot do client side resizing with flash &#60; v.10
hsover 16 years ago
ftp? it has resume built in lest u got disco while uploading
评论 #462668 未加载