TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Ask HN: What hosting do you use for personal projects?

6 pointsby martinwnetover 12 years ago
This was asked about 3 years ago: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1005067<p>What is everyone using these days? (Of particular interest to me would be hosting with free usage tiers)

16 comments

padseekerover 12 years ago
I like dreamhost a lot and have an account with them, but deploying rails was a challenge so I decided on something easier. I'm competent enough to use ssh and command line to do basic things, but beyond that I have some trouble. After doing research to find a better hosting option I went with Webbynode.<p><a href="http://webbynode.com" rel="nofollow">http://webbynode.com</a><p>I use it for my rails based startup padseeker.com. It makes pushing code via git as easy as it is for heroku, but it is more flexible, i.e. allows file uploads w/o using s3, you can use mysql or postgres (heroku only allows postgres without another service). It's been overall a good experience, very little down time. Heroku might be better for certain things, but webbynode has been perfect for my needs.<p>It's not free though - lowest plan is $15 per month. I know digital ocean starts as low as $5 per month. Dotcloud and Appfog are either free or cheap and seem comparable.
antidohover 12 years ago
With a Virtual Private Server (VPS) you are your own "master and commander." You're root.<p>I use linode for my VPS. slicehost is similar. They both offer decent publicly available documentation/tutorials, so if you can't find an answer or path in "your" providers docs, you can hop over to the other guy's.<p>With shared hosting you're a user on their (possibly virtual) server, with permission to do things. You're not root.<p>pair.com offers shared hosting, I used to use them, very stable and sober company.<p><a href="http://www.lowendbox.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.lowendbox.com/</a> might lead you to a low cost provider, I haven't looked down that path.<p>I know a lot of people use <a href="http://www.bluehost.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.bluehost.com/</a>. I don't know if they're more VPS or more shared host. I know a lot of people use it to host actual businesses; a lot of those sites use Wordpress and various shopping cart and payment solutions.
Fundlabover 12 years ago
Webfaction is not the typical shared hosting. I got sold on this "We give you a full linux shell account with all the tools you need to compile anything you like, so our service is almost as flexible as a VPS. One big advantage of our shared hosting service is that we maintain the server and keep it secure for you. Also, the memory that we provide in our plans is the actual memory that is available to your application. With a VPS you also have to run the operating system, web server, database server etc in your allocated memory."<p><a href="http://www.webfaction.com/services/hosting" rel="nofollow">http://www.webfaction.com/services/hosting</a><p>Personally I bundle this with Cloudflare and it's been flawless!<p>Caveat: No CPanel! I find their control panel very intuitive to handle and uncluttered but if CPanel is what you're looking for then you're better off elsewhere
anujkkover 12 years ago
These are what I use :<p>VPS Hosting - Linode(<a href="http://www.linode.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.linode.com/</a>)<p>Shared Hosting - WebFaction(<a href="http://www.webfaction.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.webfaction.com/</a>)
franklaemmerover 12 years ago
Here is my comparison of current and upcoming PHP Paas Hosting Services: <a href="http://blog.fortrabbit.com/comparing-cloud-hosting-platforms/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.fortrabbit.com/comparing-cloud-hosting-platforms...</a><p>I strongly believe in this kind of service - old school hosting is dead meat in my eyes. Shameless Pug: We recently launched our own PHP PaaS
ohashiover 12 years ago
Just throwing this out there, my startup tracks which web hosting companies people like the most based on opinions shared in social media: <a href="http://reviewsignal.com/webhosting/compare/" rel="nofollow">http://reviewsignal.com/webhosting/compare/</a><p>I am personally on liquidweb and aws. free tier on aws is great for testing stuff not on my local machines.
sys_argvover 12 years ago
<a href="http://www.thehosthouse.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.thehosthouse.co.uk</a> or <a href="http://www.edis.at" rel="nofollow">http://www.edis.at</a> If you are on a budget and/in Europe. I use both. No problems so far(Its been almost a year).
no_news_isover 12 years ago
Another vote for Google App Engine. Easiest to set up that I've found with a free tier. I was looking at AppFog too but never really got started.<p>Anyone want to explain why iamgopal's post got marked as link - dead?
ishbitsover 12 years ago
I'm currently using VPS services from buyvm.net. However, if business depends on it I've been using EC2 with good results.
malux85over 12 years ago
Another vote for Linode .. slightly pricer than others but high quality + root access for my zany schemes
kgutteridgeover 12 years ago
For personal projects Shared:Bluehost VPS: Linode
devb0xover 12 years ago
webfaction was a good one, i was with them for a long time. I now go VPS so I am in full control.
klautover 12 years ago
webfaction. I think they offer great value for money and their support is awesome :)
gaddersover 12 years ago
Hosting24.com
countessaover 12 years ago
webfaction www.webfaction.com
project23over 12 years ago
Shared: Bluehost<p>VPS: Linode<p>Other: AWS