It doesn't look like a lot has changed in this release, but just a reminder for those who can't upgrade right away: I'm hosting all the old docs at <a href="http://bootstrapdocs.com" rel="nofollow">http://bootstrapdocs.com</a>
Hijacking the thread a bit here. Foundation (<a href="http://foundation.zurb.com" rel="nofollow">http://foundation.zurb.com</a>) also released 3.2 on October 26th:<p><a href="http://foundation.zurb.com/docs/changelog.php" rel="nofollow">http://foundation.zurb.com/docs/changelog.php</a>
One thing Bootstrap guys should avoid doing is to modify previous css declarations. It becomes very difficult to get on the new version without breaking existing design. And by breaking I mean it will look different (line heights, spacing, etc..)
Nice, this finally fixes modals in small browser windows. <a href="http://twitter.github.com/bootstrap/javascript.html#modals" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.github.com/bootstrap/javascript.html#modals</a>
I have already started making used of 2.2.0 with media-list for my tweets (<a href="http://www.millwoodonline.co.uk/" rel="nofollow">http://www.millwoodonline.co.uk/</a>). Nice to see <a href="http://www.bootstrapcdn.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.bootstrapcdn.com/</a> already have the new version in their CDN.
Does anyone else feel like every time they release a new version of Bootstrap it is never backwards compatible? I feel like lots of divs on my site need different classes than were used before.
Would be lovely if they didn't hotlink placehold.it for their images as that site requires captcha approval before showing their images so mine is just a bunch of broken image links.
I like bootstrap but my lessc parser under Ubuntu sucks. Bad error messages (errors dont understand importing), no autocompilation and hard to install (have to install the whole Node.js world).<p>Anyone found a solution that works well under Ubuntu? (I use it with WordPress and Drupal; Rails would be nice but there I run for Sass/SCSS).
In the Carousel example... there is something very wrong with the header scrolling/timing. Click the arrows a couple of times and roll across the menu. It goes crazy.
What is the easiest way to customize Bootstrap <i>without</i> changing Bootstrap code? I mean, the easiest way for its intended audience, CSS amateurs.
carousel.html (one of the new examples) is really sexy. i think they learned lots of people are lazy and just leave their sites as pretty much stock bootstrap for a long time - so might as well make stock bootstrap look amazing. well done!<p>Here it is <a href="http://dev.82.io/carousel/" rel="nofollow">http://dev.82.io/carousel/</a><p>There seems to be a bug with the carousel though. Clicking next doesn't work and the images randomly start skipping really fast etc, at least for me (Chrome/OS X)
I'm mainly a backend guy but do some frontend work from time to time. I keep seeing all this talk about a dozen different CSS "frameworks", and I just don't get it. Can someone explain to me what the purpose of these things is? Bootstrap's site for example doesn't even try to tell me what I would want it for, it just says I want it "because its for nerds" (do I have to dress in faux-nerd chic and live in the valley to use it?) and that it uses grids (that's the opposite of a selling point guys).<p>From looking at the code, all I see is a bunch of boilerplate CSS that seems to deliberately work against the nature of CSS (protip: the C stands for cascading), and is very brittle and tied to specific classes and markup rather than using selectors to be general and reusable. Is that really all it is, just a "I'm too lazy to design my site, so I'll just use twitter's design"? Perhaps it is just the word "framework" throwing me off since it doesn't appear to be a framework in any way? I know this is going to sound needlessly critical to some people, but I am expressing genuine confusion here, I really don't understand what I am supposed to use this for, or how it would help me in any way.