TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Proust Wasn’t a Neuroscientist. Neither was Jonah Lehrer

47 pointsby nirover 12 years ago

8 comments

gruseomover 12 years ago
It's not surprising that it was Bob Dylan fans who caught Lehrer fabricating. The stuff he was saying about Dylan was obviously off – equally ignorant and glib. I remember listening to Terry Gross interviewing him well before the scandal and being shocked at what bullshit he was peddling.<p>Fabrication and plagiarism are what got him fired, and I suppose it has to be that way, but there's an unpleasant corollary: had he been a more careful or even just a less prolific bullshitter, he would still be a celebrated star of science writing.
评论 #4724328 未加载
fourmiiover 12 years ago
It's pretty disappointing, I love reading these popular science books. I guess they're fun to read because they're entertaining, now I know how some of these authors are making them entertaining...<p>This was a pretty interesting article in itself to read.
droithommeover 12 years ago
"Self-plagiarizing" isn't a real thing. It's complete nonsense to say you are plagiarizing from yourself.<p>Shocking part is so many people are just falling for this argument without thinking about it. As well as those who think about it, and to join in the thrills of a witch hunt, justify to themselves that this self-plagiarization is not just a real thing, but unethical behavior bordering on criminal.<p>Fabricating quotes and making up facts though is bad and justifies firing and blacklisting. Both practices are unfortunately endemic within contemporary publications, perhaps due to a lack of fact checkers at many publishers.
评论 #4724175 未加载
评论 #4724276 未加载
评论 #4724004 未加载
评论 #4724288 未加载
评论 #4724172 未加载
desireco42over 12 years ago
Did any thought reading this..."Malcolm Gladwell"?
评论 #4723282 未加载
评论 #4723090 未加载
kibaover 12 years ago
I like to read popular science book. Does that mean that I have to give up reading popular science and read dreary academic papers?
评论 #4724043 未加载
评论 #4723714 未加载
评论 #4723816 未加载
评论 #4723626 未加载
评论 #4722897 未加载
评论 #4722802 未加载
评论 #4724418 未加载
评论 #4722991 未加载
kibaover 12 years ago
Is anybody wondering: What's Jonah Lehrer doing now?
评论 #4723312 未加载
tzsover 12 years ago
OT: that was a good example of a print link that is not obnoxious. Unlike most print links, it did not come up with a freakishly wide columns of diminutive text, and had a clear way to get the non-print version so that one can read the comments and other extras lost on the print version. More sites should implement their print links like that.
评论 #4724581 未加载
xaaover 12 years ago
It's interesting how relatively minor fabrications like these earned Lehrer complete ostracism, yet much huger distortions are told in the political arena daily and no one bats an eye. To pick a random example, "there is no evidence for climate change". I wonder why the double standard?
评论 #4724544 未加载
评论 #4724419 未加载