Well, nice, really nice idea. Tried it and was frustrated by the poor quality, of the screenshot it produced. Grainy and blurred fonts, nothing I would wanna use.<p>And the software had obvious problems parsing my css-styles. Some headlines were way of...<p>Hope you might be able to fix these issues. If not, you are (at least in my case) not usable...
Should be easy enough doing with phantom.js <a href="http://skookum.com/blog/dynamic-screenshots-on-the-server-with-phantomjs/" rel="nofollow">http://skookum.com/blog/dynamic-screenshots-on-the-server-wi...</a>
This is nice, but I find webkit2png <a href="http://www.paulhammond.org/webkit2png/" rel="nofollow">http://www.paulhammond.org/webkit2png/</a> (brew install webkit2png) a more simple and flexible way to quickly generate images (and thumbnails) of webpages.<p>This is nice, that it hosts them for you immediately, although dropbox live links are pretty easy.<p>Inception: <a href="https://dl.dropbox.com/u/103062/webkit2png.png" rel="nofollow">https://dl.dropbox.com/u/103062/webkit2png.png</a>
If you need to host your own screenshot/html2png app, I've built this on top of PhantomJS: <a href="https://github.com/w3p/htmlshots" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/w3p/htmlshots</a>. It uses PhantomJS's builtin webserver module to serve screenshots, so you don't need to spawn a new process for each screenshot request.
I entered <a href="http://www.tumblr.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.tumblr.com</a> and it took around 5 seconds to come up with a result, this is because tumblr uses "endless scrolling".<p>Is this by design?
As others mentioned - PhantomJS is way to go, it supports webfonts as well - <a href="http://www.grab.lv/_external/testpreview.png" rel="nofollow">http://www.grab.lv/_external/testpreview.png</a>