TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Technical founders have nothing to lose

9 pointsby martinvanakenover 12 years ago

6 comments

alexchamberlainover 12 years ago
Technical cofounders have everything to lose.<p>If you are any good, you have a job and, therefore, the opportunity cost of launching a startup is massive.
评论 #4942493 未加载
palebluedotover 12 years ago
This seems a bit naive - perhaps it would be better targeted as "technical founders need less capital".<p>For instance, you still have legal liability risks, which may vary depending on the problems your startup / business is trying to solve. Especially in the early stage, even if you have a corporate entity wrapped around your startup, mounting a legal defense can be financially crushing. This is doubly true if you are augmenting your cash stream by consulting / contracting.<p>This may not be very likely, depending on the startup - but to say technical founders have nothing to lose seems a bit naive.
ojbyrneover 12 years ago
That's clearly not correct, since there is opportunity cost.
评论 #4942451 未加载
computerslolover 12 years ago
I have a deliverable due today; will someone elaborate on the following?<p>Career Trajectory. Job 1: 5,000 users. Job 2: 10,000 users. Job 3: 500,000 users. Job 4: 1,000,000 users. Job 5: 10,000,000 users. How many users does the startup have, how will that destroy my resume, and how long will it take me to recover my career if the startup fails?<p>Opportunity Cost vs. Peak Production Years Remaining. I am 20 something years old. I only have so many years of peak production remaining before it's time to have a family and a house and all that. Is a startup the best way to spend those years when I am worth $x per hour on the market?
sqrt17over 12 years ago
The basic advice in the article seems to be: use consulting as well as doing a lean startup to achieve (i) a fluid stream of income [from consulting] and (ii) a hopefully-growing stream of passive income [from startup]. (As far as I can tell, it's also what Patrick 'kalzumeus' McKenzie and others are recommending).<p>Part of the "nothing to lose" assumption seems to be that doing a startup gives you a learning effect that outweighs the lost revenue you had to give up for doing a (failed/failing) startup in the first place?
NateDadover 12 years ago
There's a lot more than opportunity cost. There's the actual money in my pocket lost from the (probably very good) salary that I would be making at an established company. Most people still have to pay the rent or the mortgage. That's the main barrier of entry. It's not that we think we'll have to max out all our credit cards... the cost of renting some EC2 instances pales in comparison to my mortgage, I can tell you that much.
评论 #4945402 未加载