Or as Chris Sacca once put it in "The Trouble With Libertarians":<p>> <i>I think, sometimes, like, arguing with libertarians can be really frustrating because, I think, it can be, um..., I think it can be intellectually lazy. And I think it can be convenient, and, in the same way that, um, you know when everything is going right it's easy to attribute it to your own success and when things are going wrong, it's because you got fucked or because you were unlucky etc., like, I think sometimes, like, the libertarian point of view can be, um..., can be rooted in a limited set of circumstances where you give yourself a little more credit than, um.., than you want, or than you are due, probably.</i><p>Source: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ViHuU6-CFDo" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ViHuU6-CFDo</a><p>I recommend watching the entire Chris Sacca Pando Monthly Fireside chat.<p>It is extremely awesome.<p>Just a teaser of what you'll see: $12 million is gained and lost, bankruptcy makes an appearance, the dot com crash crushes everybody, the rise of Google, playing with $4 billion in cash at FCC poker, running a billion dollar hedge fund, being a ski bum whilst simultaneously graduating near the top of his class at law school, then going on to live in poverty and working his ass off just to stay in the game and getting really, really, really fucking lucky :)<p>Yes, that awesome.<p>Entire talk here: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iqUG2_cmZ6I" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iqUG2_cmZ6I</a><p>Both the above article, and Chris Sacca are actually referring the the just world fallacy, a derivative of the fundamental attirbution effect, which in combination with cognitive dissonance, allows people to do the following:<p>> <i>As a simple example, consider a situation where a driver, Alice, is about to pass through an intersection. Her light turns green, and so she begins moving forward when an ambulance blows through the red-light with sirens blaring and lights flashing, and cuts her off. Despite knowing that there is a good reason for the driver's behaviour, she is likely to form a negative opinion of the driver, e.g. "what an inconsiderate driver!".</i><p>Source: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_attribution_error" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_attribution_error</a><p>You will not believe how many things in life are, ironically enough, a derivative of the fundamental attribution error (e.g. republicans/conservatives/religion/start-up conferences - so many others).<p>And another video on what entrepreneurship feels like: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t3NC_w9AOSA" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t3NC_w9AOSA</a>