TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Billionaires

83 pointsby markbnineover 12 years ago

21 comments

powertowerover 12 years ago
Tagged by how they made their money - first mover advantage, hard work and insight, theft, unfair practices, cheating, destroying the environment, war profiteering, rackets, bribery, political corruption, pure luck, ovarian lottery, etc, would be a much more interesting read.
评论 #5106178 未加载
评论 #5106200 未加载
ok_craigover 12 years ago
Whenever I see these lists I always find it interesting to think about the fact that the only reason a Walton isn't in #1 is because Sam is long gone, and his value was split between his children, all 4 of whom have $30+ billion. Kinda crazy.
评论 #5105982 未加载
评论 #5105907 未加载
评论 #5105884 未加载
评论 #5106408 未加载
评论 #5106710 未加载
tptacekover 12 years ago
Not a single self-made woman makes the top 100.
评论 #5106083 未加载
评论 #5106320 未加载
评论 #5106739 未加载
评论 #5106116 未加载
评论 #5106176 未加载
评论 #5106292 未加载
评论 #5106063 未加载
downandoutover 12 years ago
It's interesting that the only 3 self-made billionaires under 40 are in tech - Larry Page, Sergey Brin, and Mark Zuckerberg. The fact that 12 of the top 100 are Russian is rather striking to me as well.
评论 #5106027 未加载
评论 #5106101 未加载
maniacwhatover 12 years ago
I may be reading it wrong, but it looks to me that there are no female self-made billionaires, which is interesting.
评论 #5105906 未加载
评论 #5105902 未加载
sergiotapiaover 12 years ago
Surprised to see Sergei Brin so low on the list, considering his website is the number 1 IN THE ENTIRE PLANET.<p>Then I remembered, the old saying: "You gotta diversify yo bonds, nigga." [1] - The top spots have mining operations, tech, banking, etc.<p>[1] - <a href="http://www.comedycentral.com/video-clips/tw2ltp/chappelle-s-show-wu-tang-financial" rel="nofollow">http://www.comedycentral.com/video-clips/tw2ltp/chappelle-s-...</a>
评论 #5105961 未加载
评论 #5105942 未加载
bjhoops1over 12 years ago
At risk of sounding like a communist...<p>When you consider just how much money $10+ billion is, from an ethical standpoint, does any individual deserve to have that much money/power?<p>I can't help but think that it is really a grotesque thing for a single person to have more money than the GDP of a country like Cuba. There's just no way one person has contributed to society enough to justify that kind of wealth.
评论 #5105960 未加载
评论 #5106025 未加载
评论 #5106281 未加载
评论 #5106048 未加载
评论 #5106007 未加载
评论 #5106059 未加载
评论 #5106243 未加载
评论 #5106431 未加载
评论 #5107029 未加载
评论 #5106168 未加载
评论 #5106162 未加载
msandfordover 12 years ago
How is it that Bloomberg himself isn't on the list? According to Wikipedia he's worth $25B which is well within the top 100.
learc83over 12 years ago
Why does the link go to directly to self made, energy billionaires?
评论 #5106005 未加载
评论 #5106261 未加载
guimarinover 12 years ago
Wow. The infographic is cool but some of the copy is incredibly snarky. On Mark Zuckerburg under 'intelligence' "Sister Randi likes to pretend she was a television production assistant." That said I think it's more interesting to see who the next 900 richest people are than the top 100. maybe just me though.
julesover 12 years ago
Interesting that 71 of the 100 are self made. Of the 29 that inherited their wealth, 12 are female, however of the 71 that are self made, none are female. Very surprising that the disparity is that huge. Also surprising that only one of the 100 is black. We have a long way to go!
评论 #5106979 未加载
abatover 12 years ago
Is this list accurate? I don't see Bloomberg (the person). According to Wikipedia, he's worth 25B, so I would expect to see him.
评论 #5105994 未加载
评论 #5106002 未加载
ggordanover 12 years ago
Is there a reason why the Rothschild family doesn't appear on the list? I'd imagine that they are still billionaires.
评论 #5106409 未加载
GuiAover 12 years ago
Wouldn't Laurene Powell technically have a very nice spot on this list?
评论 #5105951 未加载
p3r1over 12 years ago
Someone have checked the "map" part? It shows a world map with a slider of the last year net worth changes. Something happens at April 18 and August 2.
elboruover 12 years ago
It's interesting how the richest man in the world comes from a third world country (Carlos Slim from Mexico).
评论 #5106599 未加载
评论 #5106305 未加载
评论 #5106322 未加载
arbugeover 12 years ago
One inaccuracy: Ortega (founder &#38; ceo of Zara) doesn't pop up when you choose apparel.
redwoodover 12 years ago
Interesting, only 1 British. Zero in Singapore... seems likely incorrect.
gavanwooleryover 12 years ago
Big mistake:<p>They drew eyebrows on Larry Ellison.<p>(Reference image: <a href="http://allthingsd.com/files/2012/05/larry_ellison1.png" rel="nofollow">http://allthingsd.com/files/2012/05/larry_ellison1.png</a>)
CleanedStarover 12 years ago
#6 and #7 on the list are the Koch brothers. Under the categories "inherited" or "self-made" Bloomberg lists them as "self-made". Only 29 of the 100 are listed as having inherited their wealth. Ibn Saud's grandson, Alwaleed Al Saud is #16 and is also listed by Bloomberg as self-made. I guess even if you're the grandson of the guy your country is named after, you can still be listed as self-made by Bloomberg. Happy to see these self-made guys pulled themselves up by their bootstraps and became billionaires.
评论 #5106423 未加载
评论 #5106440 未加载
rgloverover 12 years ago
Fuck billionaires.