Very cool, but I don't see file size as a significant factor when making a decision about what library to use. With SPDY, fast pipes & 4G, minification etc, worrying about super tiny file sizes is becoming a legacy issue.
I've uploaded a screenshot for anyone who just wants a peek: <a href="http://decodering.com/post/41361083824/helium" rel="nofollow">http://decodering.com/post/41361083824/helium</a><p>(I tweaked the padding too.)
> The compiled default CSS file weighs in at a comparatively tiny 30k, versus approximately 100k for Bootstrap and almost 200k for Foundation.<p>At first I was sceptical that this was even close to a fair comparison, however even after stripping Bootstrap back to comparable functionality its CSS still weighs in at 68KB.<p>I will be watching this project with interest, but I think it probably needs a lot more use before all the edge case bugs (that Bootstrap has probably already dealt with) get ironed out.
Skeleton [1] is a nice lightweight alternative too, with very discreet default styles.<p>[1] <a href="http://www.getskeleton.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.getskeleton.com</a>
Are there like many of these floating around? It seems like We get a "Like Bootstrap" every week or so. Ink,<p><a href="http://ink.sapo.pt/index.php" rel="nofollow">http://ink.sapo.pt/index.php</a><p>Didn't even got to frontpage two weeks ago. And possibly many others.
Very interesting stuff. I have been working on my own project this way from scratch too. Gotten so far as under 100kb with all images [raw data URIs] combined so far.<p>Will give this project a close look in the weekend.