From an earlier Hacker News comment<p><a href="http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5196734" rel="nofollow">http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5196734</a><p>on a submission from this blog:<p>> > It appears you've made some sort of resolution to publish and promote a blog entry per day in 2013. 40 entries in 41 days this year vs. 46 in all of 2012. You should reconsider - whatever your reasons were, I doubt they included a desire to develop a reputation for presenting topics that were sensationalized and thinly researched [1] produced with a pace that ensures discredited theories dont get reviewed. <p>[1] <a href="http://asserttrue.blogspot.com/2013/02/drug-companies-stop-hiding-your-data.html " rel="nofollow">http://asserttrue.blogspot.com/2013/02/drug-companies-stop-h...</a><p>> Wow, nice spot and they have all been submitted to HN. I have never seen anyone's submission history be so hell bent on self promotion:<p><a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/submitted?id=techdog" rel="nofollow">https://news.ycombinator.com/submitted?id=techdog</a>
There's much less mercury in a single vaccine dose than in the average can of tuna.<p>Almost every kid eats many magnatudes more mercury in their food than thy get in all the vaccines they get in their entire life. And this food-sourced mercury compounds are usually MUCH more toxic versions than the kind in vaccines.<p>But then again when someone says "Speaking for myself, I would never knowingly give a child of mine a vaccine containing mercury, even if there were no links to autism" then it's clear they're an idiot to begin with.