TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Panoramic, high resolution picture of London

162 pointsby danielhuntabout 12 years ago

35 comments

nakedrobot2about 12 years ago
Hi,<p>Creator of the image here. First of all, thank you for all the attention, it's a real honor to be on the front page oF HN for almost a whole day now.<p>I am the founder of 360cities.net and creator of previous world record images such as "Prague 18 gigapixels", "Strahov Library 40 gigapixels" and "London 80 Gigapixels". This newest image was commissioned by BT as a kind of closing "Thank you London" gesture of the Olympic year. Of course, they didn't want "just" a jaw-droppingly enormous image, they wanted a <i>world record</i> image! Unfortunately, these things are getting a lot harder to accomplish, and we're starting to go up against some constrainsts of optics, air density, and so on.<p>So, to create this image, we needed 4 cameras shooting simultaneously in order to get all the images in a reasonable length of time. We needed the very best optics out there, and CMOS sensors with the smallest pixels (somewhat unfortunately this meant the 3 year old Canon 7D). We needed the fasted and most precise panoramic robots to mount the cameras on. We needed gigantic memory cards, 128GB, to store a full run of images on one card. We needed 4 laptops to copy the cards quick enough to shoot again (buying more cards wasn't in the budget). In short, we needed a ridiculous amount of gear - this took 2 days to set up.<p>We spent 3 days shooting. The first day it was raining, but we shot anyway to learn the gear and see what mistakes we might make. The second day there were 50km/h winds which, 150 meters up, is very cold and a little bit dangerous. We made sure the gear was triple secured, and we shot anyway. One of the three photographers threatened to leave the project. It was unpleasant. But we uncovered more issues which we were able to solve. Keep in mind the cameras were moving continuously, and focusing, and shooting - they never stopped to take a shot. 12600 shots while moving and focusing each time? This required some very exacting work, knowing the gear, and maybe even a bit of luck.<p>Day 3 was clear, and not windy. We got 2 sets of images shot. All cameras got the shots they needed in 2 sets. That is 96000 images with not a shot missed. This to me is a huge technological achievement that i'm proud of, and I will sing the praises of Canon anytime someone asks me to :-)<p>Now, on to stitching. Normally I have no problem stitching 2 or 4 thousand images. But this is an order of magnitude more. As gabriel weinberg noted recently, you find out what breaks when you increase things by an order of magnitude.<p>Basically, the stitching software, Kolor Autopano Giga, was basically inoperable with this size data set. They scolded me for not having told them about this shoot beforehand. They told me that they know about the issues but other things are taking precedence in the development of the software. Stitching a world record amount of images is, by definition, an edge case. So they weren't really able to help me.<p>Stitching ended up taking nearly 4 months when we thought it would take about 4 weeks. These 4 months were spent working until 3 or 4am many nights of the week. Deadlines slipped. I suffered. My family suffered. After 6 weeks of work I had accomplished nearly nothing and started to panic. I just had to keep on pushing....<p>In the end, we had to set a delivery date for the client. This required me to leave a few mistakes in the image that I would have liked to fix. However keep in mind that some areas of bad alignment on a normal image might take 30 minutes to fix, but with this size project in the software, it took A WEEK to fix. This kind of work is extremely demoralizing and there isn't much to be learned from it either.<p>In the end, the image is finished. As they say "you never finish, you only stop!". I'll probably make a few more fixes, later. For right now I need to decompress for a while.<p>So that is some background on how the image was created. It's not perfect, but overall it is much better than I expected. Shipping it was a terrible, brutal grind that I hope to never experience again. But it's done now and that feels pretty sweet.<p>I'm typing this on the bus home from the airport after being in London for a tv show where they announced the image. That was fun. But the best feeling is knowing that the thing is finished and shipped, and if I ever have to do a similar job again I will hopefully learn from the mistakes made on this one and not have such a terrible grind again.<p>I'm happy to answer any questions about the image that I didn't answer here. thank you!
评论 #5261524 未加载
评论 #5260618 未加载
评论 #5259147 未加载
评论 #5261262 未加载
评论 #5260628 未加载
评论 #5260186 未加载
评论 #5259669 未加载
Peroniabout 12 years ago
Compiled a short list of the more famous sights for those of you not familiar with the city (I'll add more later):<p>1. The Shard (Tate Modern in the foreground) - <a href="http://btlondon2012.co.uk/pano.html?view.hlookat=-33.1601&#38;view.vlookat=2.2475&#38;view.fov=4.8933&#38;imarkerath=-33.1601&#38;imarkeratv=2.2475" rel="nofollow">http://btlondon2012.co.uk/pano.html?view.hlookat=-33.1601&#3...</a><p>2. London Eye - <a href="http://btlondon2012.co.uk/pano.html?view.hlookat=-3.8135&#38;view.vlookat=3.0432&#38;view.fov=3.5602&#38;imarkerath=-3.8135&#38;imarkeratv=3.0432" rel="nofollow">http://btlondon2012.co.uk/pano.html?view.hlookat=-3.8135&#38...</a><p>3. Tower Bridge - <a href="http://btlondon2012.co.uk/pano.html?view.hlookat=-38.7356&#38;view.vlookat=2.2507&#38;view.fov=2.7320&#38;imarkerath=-38.7356&#38;imarkeratv=2.2507" rel="nofollow">http://btlondon2012.co.uk/pano.html?view.hlookat=-38.7356&#3...</a><p>4. Wembley Stadium - <a href="http://btlondon2012.co.uk/pano.html?view.hlookat=140.7253&#38;view.vlookat=0.8721&#38;view.fov=11.6507&#38;imarkerath=140.7253&#38;imarkeratv=0.8721" rel="nofollow">http://btlondon2012.co.uk/pano.html?view.hlookat=140.7253&#3...</a><p>5. Battersea Power Station - <a href="http://btlondon2012.co.uk/pano.html?view.hlookat=35.2192&#38;view.vlookat=2.9160&#38;view.fov=2.8203&#38;imarkerath=35.2192&#38;imarkeratv=2.9160%20#BTTowerView" rel="nofollow">http://btlondon2012.co.uk/pano.html?view.hlookat=35.2192&#38...</a><p>6. Olympic Park - <a href="http://btlondon2012.co.uk/pano.html?view.hlookat=-73.9268&#38;view.vlookat=1.1407&#38;view.fov=2.7782&#38;imarkerath=-73.9268&#38;imarkeratv=1.1407" rel="nofollow">http://btlondon2012.co.uk/pano.html?view.hlookat=-73.9268&#3...</a><p>7. Big Ben &#38; Houses of Parliament - <a href="http://btlondon2012.co.uk/pano.html?view.hlookat=6.4768&#38;view.vlookat=2.4614&#38;view.fov=3.3866&#38;imarkerath=6.4768&#38;imarkeratv=2.4614" rel="nofollow">http://btlondon2012.co.uk/pano.html?view.hlookat=6.4768&#38;...</a><p>8. MI6 Building - <a href="http://btlondon2012.co.uk/pano.html?view.hlookat=14.9167&#38;view.vlookat=2.5274&#38;view.fov=1.9034&#38;imarkerath=14.9167&#38;imarkeratv=2.5274" rel="nofollow">http://btlondon2012.co.uk/pano.html?view.hlookat=14.9167&#38...</a><p>9. St Pauls Cathedral - <a href="http://btlondon2012.co.uk/pano.html?view.hlookat=-43.8561&#38;view.vlookat=2.4828&#38;view.fov=2.9417&#38;imarkerath=-43.8561&#38;imarkeratv=2.4828" rel="nofollow">http://btlondon2012.co.uk/pano.html?view.hlookat=-43.8561&#3...</a><p>10. Nelsons Column - <a href="http://btlondon2012.co.uk/pano.html?view.hlookat=13.4841&#38;view.vlookat=5.1344&#38;view.fov=1.4156&#38;imarkerath=13.4841&#38;imarkeratv=5.1344" rel="nofollow">http://btlondon2012.co.uk/pano.html?view.hlookat=13.4841&#38...</a><p>11. Behind the iconic billboards in Picadilly Circus - <a href="http://btlondon2012.co.uk/pano.html?view.hlookat=16.9026&#38;view.vlookat=6.5854&#38;view.fov=1.2770&#38;imarkerath=16.9026&#38;imarkeratv=6.5854" rel="nofollow">http://btlondon2012.co.uk/pano.html?view.hlookat=16.9026&#38...</a><p>12. Harrods Department Store - <a href="http://btlondon2012.co.uk/pano.html?view.hlookat=64.6214&#38;view.vlookat=3.4378&#38;view.fov=1.0196&#38;imarkerath=64.6214&#38;imarkeratv=3.4378" rel="nofollow">http://btlondon2012.co.uk/pano.html?view.hlookat=64.6214&#38...</a><p>13. The British Museum - <a href="http://btlondon2012.co.uk/pano.html?view.hlookat=-45.7275&#38;view.vlookat=7.9743&#38;view.fov=8.5317&#38;imarkerath=-45.7275&#38;imarkeratv=7.9743" rel="nofollow">http://btlondon2012.co.uk/pano.html?view.hlookat=-45.7275&#3...</a>
评论 #5257646 未加载
评论 #5261268 未加载
评论 #5257206 未加载
darxiusabout 12 years ago
I think I found the portal to Cthulhu's plane: <a href="http://btlondon2012.co.uk/pano.html?view.hlookat=-97.0026&#38;view.vlookat=6.1219&#38;view.fov=3.7128&#38;imarkerath=-97.0026&#38;imarkeratv=6.1219" rel="nofollow">http://btlondon2012.co.uk/pano.html?view.hlookat=-97.0026&#3...</a>
alanbyrneabout 12 years ago
These things always feel like they pan the reverse way than they should...
评论 #5261001 未加载
评论 #5256900 未加载
grabehabout 12 years ago
<a href="http://btlondon2012.co.uk/pano.html?view.hlookat=-164.6520&#38;view.vlookat=21.4926&#38;view.fov=4.2410&#38;imarkerath=-164.6520&#38;imarkeratv=21.4926" rel="nofollow">http://btlondon2012.co.uk/pano.html?view.hlookat=-164.6520&#...</a><p>Interesting to see a shot capturing the progress of a car which helps determine the rate at which the images were taken.
评论 #5257756 未加载
sheriabout 12 years ago
I found buzby. :) The image is clickable, which brings up a sweepstakes competition. Cute Easter Egg.<p><a href="http://btlondon2012.co.uk/pano.html?view.hlookat=168.9705&#38;view.vlookat=42.9767&#38;view.fov=1.2811&#38;imarkerath=168.9705&#38;imarkeratv=42.9767" rel="nofollow">http://btlondon2012.co.uk/pano.html?view.hlookat=168.9705&#3...</a>
评论 #5257120 未加载
pawelwentpawelabout 12 years ago
It's massive! I couldn't find my bedroom window but I've stumbled upon this guy instead : <a href="http://btlondon2012.co.uk/pano.html?view.hlookat=172.0456&#38;view.vlookat=40.5469&#38;view.fov=0.9885&#38;imarkerath=172.0456&#38;imarkeratv=40.5469" rel="nofollow">http://btlondon2012.co.uk/pano.html?view.hlookat=172.0456&#3...</a><p>EDIT: I'm wondering - if Google has to anonymise faces and registration plates on street view, shouldn't BT be doing it too with this high-res panoramic image?
评论 #5261017 未加载
评论 #5257548 未加载
shocksabout 12 years ago
Something funky going on here... <a href="http://btlondon2012.co.uk/pano.html?view.hlookat=-96.8554&#38;view.vlookat=6.3616&#38;view.fov=3.0874&#38;imarkerath=-96.8554&#38;imarkeratv=6.3616" rel="nofollow">http://btlondon2012.co.uk/pano.html?view.hlookat=-96.8554&#3...</a><p>I don't remember architecture like this! :P<p>edit: Wrong link. -_- Intended to post upside-down building...<p>edit2: Corrected link.
评论 #5257061 未加载
评论 #5257211 未加载
评论 #5256925 未加载
评论 #5256917 未加载
platzabout 12 years ago
Very cool. I wish there wasn't as much HDR-like post processing in these images. It kind of has an "uncanny valley" thing going on.
评论 #5261103 未加载
druckenabout 12 years ago
There's a surprising lack of people and candid shots compared to the last 10,000-shot panaroma by 360 Cities several years ago!<p>I assume that has to do with the timing of the shots. These seem to have been taken very early in the morning and towards the beginning of autumn (based on clothing).<p>Unlike the 360 Cities panaroma, there are far less discontinuities this time, though I have already found a significant one [1]. I guess the almost 5-fold increase in shots is the source of the improvement.<p>Also, the depth of view in this panaroma is ridiculous! You can actually clearly see individual people playing soccer or walking through very distant parks...<p>[1] <a href="http://btlondon2012.co.uk/pano.html?view.hlookat=-96.8425&#38;view.vlookat=5.7463&#38;view.fov=9.9230&#38;imarkerath=-96.8425&#38;imarkeratv=5.7463" rel="nofollow">http://btlondon2012.co.uk/pano.html?view.hlookat=-96.8425&#3...</a>
评论 #5258123 未加载
评论 #5261034 未加载
newishuserabout 12 years ago
Wish it had google maps type navigation, wish the images weren't HDRd in post.<p>Other than that it's pretty cool.
jackmabout 12 years ago
If anyone's interested, the multicolored group of buildings you see when first opening this page is one of Google's offices at Central St Giles. I've been there many times for training/meetings/the free lunch and it's amazing.<p>They have a 360 degree gym at the very top, along with multiple roof terraces, a huge cafeteria (of course) and soundproofed meeting rooms with funny names.<p>One of the office floors is styled like a submarine, complete with big metal doors with valves on them. They share the space with multiple Media Agencies and other companies, so you would never know it was there. It's quite surreal and invokes a ton of envy.
dia80about 12 years ago
Yikes! I live about 2 miles away and I can make out the garden tools on my balcony.
评论 #5257640 未加载
runn1ngabout 12 years ago
If you look into the black mark under its feet and let it zoom far enough so it snaps into the level of another photo type, you can see the construction it possibly stands on.<p><a href="http://btlondon2012.co.uk/pano.html?view.hlookat=-53.1605&#38;view.vlookat=70.8474&#38;view.fov=0.9926&#38;imarkerath=-53.1605&#38;imarkeratv=70.8474" rel="nofollow">http://btlondon2012.co.uk/pano.html?view.hlookat=-53.1605&#3...</a><p>(move a little to the left I guess... it's not working 100% properly)
Pr1smabout 12 years ago
It strikes me that in such a densely populated environment there is so much under utilised space on the roof tops. Lots of opportunities for sheds and roof gardens.
评论 #5256961 未加载
petercooperabout 12 years ago
It strikes me how insignificant the River Thames is from there, I imagine most folks not familiar with London would struggle to find it(!)
marcusmacinnesabout 12 years ago
A friend of mine Henry Stuart has done some amazing GigaPixel shots of London: <a href="http://www.sphericalimages.com/panoramas" rel="nofollow">http://www.sphericalimages.com/panoramas</a> if you like this kind of thing!<p>(Including some 360 degree video: <a href="http://www.sphericalimages.com/videos" rel="nofollow">http://www.sphericalimages.com/videos</a> )
hakaaaaakabout 12 years ago
Someone's going to have a nice meal for two or be ringing two incredibly large attention bells: <a href="http://btlondon2012.co.uk/pano.html?view.hlookat=-56.2662&#38;view.vlookat=25.7578&#38;view.fov=0.2132&#38;imarkerath=-56.2662&#38;imarkeratv=25.7578" rel="nofollow">http://btlondon2012.co.uk/pano.html?view.hlookat=-56.2662&#3...</a>
评论 #5256908 未加载
m4tthumphreyabout 12 years ago
Can't wait for someone to find a couple going at it on a tower block window. Brandon style [1]<p>[1] <a href="http://www.evilbeetgossip.com/2011/03/03/want-to-see-michael-fassbender-banging-a-girl-against-a-glass-window/" rel="nofollow">http://www.evilbeetgossip.com/2011/03/03/want-to-see-michael...</a>
adammanabout 12 years ago
I don't know how this guy is still standing.<p><a href="http://btlondon2012.co.uk/pano.html?view.hlookat=-46.1228&#38;view.vlookat=23.3764&#38;view.fov=0.5148&#38;imarkerath=-46.1228&#38;imarkeratv=23.3764" rel="nofollow">http://btlondon2012.co.uk/pano.html?view.hlookat=-46.1228&#3...</a>
guy_cabout 12 years ago
I hope no passwords on PostIt notes - <a href="http://btlondon2012.co.uk/pano.html?view.hlookat=-92.6367&#38;view.vlookat=34.5444&#38;view.fov=0.6409&#38;imarkerath=-92.6367&#38;imarkeratv=34.5444" rel="nofollow">http://btlondon2012.co.uk/pano.html?view.hlookat=-92.6367&#3...</a>
dennisgorelikabout 12 years ago
This guy's boots look huge: <a href="http://btlondon2012.co.uk/pano.html?view.hlookat=194.6209&#38;view.vlookat=68.8504&#38;view.fov=0.4807&#38;imarkerath=194.6209&#38;imarkeratv=68.8504" rel="nofollow">http://btlondon2012.co.uk/pano.html?view.hlookat=194.6209&#3...</a>
TheSwordsmanabout 12 years ago
Interesting ... <a href="http://btlondon2012.co.uk/pano.html?view.hlookat=-96.8192&#38;view.vlookat=5.9197&#38;view.fov=4.6055&#38;imarkerath=-96.8192&#38;imarkeratv=5.9197" rel="nofollow">http://btlondon2012.co.uk/pano.html?view.hlookat=-96.8192&#3...</a>
pcgabout 12 years ago
Found a Buzby: <a href="http://btlondon2012.co.uk/pano.html?view.hlookat=174.0788&#38;view.vlookat=2.8315&#38;view.fov=2.0906&#38;imarkerath=174.0788&#38;imarkeratv=2.8315" rel="nofollow">http://btlondon2012.co.uk/pano.html?view.hlookat=174.0788&#3...</a>
4HTn77NR384oMjHabout 12 years ago
Busy man?<p><a href="http://btlondon2012.co.uk/pano.html?view.hlookat=-64.2875&#38;view.vlookat=17.4529&#38;view.fov=0.2919&#38;imarkerath=-64.2875&#38;imarkeratv=17.4529" rel="nofollow">http://btlondon2012.co.uk/pano.html?view.hlookat=-64.2875&#3...</a>
评论 #5258393 未加载
alanskabout 12 years ago
Or from the Shard: <a href="http://static.guim.co.uk/interactivestore/2013/2/1/1359683910917/471154/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://static.guim.co.uk/interactivestore/2013/2/1/135968391...</a>
film42about 12 years ago
Can you imagine if google acquired this company for street view?
评论 #5261069 未加载
baneabout 12 years ago
Oh I see, when you zoom in enough, it transitions to an ultra-close shot. A little jarring, but you can see things much nicer that way.
joellabout 12 years ago
This would be the ultimate "Where's Waldo?"
评论 #5257727 未加载
评论 #5257246 未加载
beytiabout 12 years ago
there's a half guy here: <a href="http://btlondon2012.co.uk/pano.html?view.hlookat=-46.0400&#38;view.vlookat=23.7366&#38;view.fov=0.7804&#38;imarkerath=-46.0400&#38;imarkeratv=23.7366" rel="nofollow">http://btlondon2012.co.uk/pano.html?view.hlookat=-46.0400&#3...</a> #BTTowerView
评论 #5257689 未加载
___1___about 12 years ago
I found it rather creepy (yet cool) that I could easily read a number plate miles away.
sideprojectabout 12 years ago
is it just me? or can you actually spot a human being in this photo? It's an incredible image though!
评论 #5256889 未加载
jstalinabout 12 years ago
Look kids! Big Ben! Parliament!
评论 #5257369 未加载
infinitebeamabout 12 years ago
where are the people ? No one seems to be living in any apartments.
VaedaStrikeabout 12 years ago
Found a very poorly photoshopped seam right off the bat. Kind of sad for something claiming to be of such quality to go in and botch it like that. I'm sure it's covering something to keep people happy, but did you have to do it in such an ugly and obvious way?
评论 #5259214 未加载