Stack Overflow Moderator Election

Anybody who promises to stop deleting and locking interesting questions on Stack Overflow gets my vote.<p>Wikipedia has the same problem.

A moderator that saves me from having to type long queries on google has my vote. I currently have to type: termtosearch site:stackoverflow.com "closed as not".

I'll be looking for moderators who won't close "Why?" questions on the basis that knowing "why" doesn't solve an existing problem.

Why does an upvote/downvote community need moderators? Isn't the whole point of letting users upvote and downvote content to avoid having moderator overlords?

Should be closed as <i>not a real question</i> and <i>too localized</i>.

A popularity contest to choose moderators? I wouldn't run my forums that way. We would end up with the wrong people in charge.

I'd vote for moderators who punish people for answering:-<p>X. It took me Y seconds to google your problem and find that solution.<p>It'd save me downvoting every time I see that kind of ridiculous passive aggressive bullshit.