TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Invest in startups that pitched at YC Demo Day

40 pointsby npt4279about 12 years ago

10 comments

jcrabout 12 years ago
If I'm reading things correctly, people who don't qualify as an accredited investor (or prefer not to state) are unable to invest until sometime in this Summer 2013 when the SEC enacts Title III of the JOBS Act.<p>Is this correct?
评论 #5447142 未加载
评论 #5446810 未加载
dxhdrabout 12 years ago
A startup for crowd-vesting in startups...<p>Am I the only one that sees this as some kind of signal that the capital markets are hopelessly fubar'd? That perhaps the dollar is turning to garbage faster than we'd like to admit if everyone's lining up to throw thousands after bad ideas in the hopes they'll strike it rich?<p>Is this really a good thing? Or maybe I'm being far too cynical here and crowd-funding is really the road to salvation? I don't like Wall-Street controlling capital any more than the next guy...
评论 #5446819 未加载
评论 #5447076 未加载
web007about 12 years ago
I'm all for "crowdfunding" startups, but I don't like the way that WeFunder is going about it in my case.<p>I went through their questionnaire and found out I'm not allowed to invest - fair enough, the rules will get fixed eventually. Then today, I got an email today to say "We have this great investment opportunity! Oh, by the way, screw you because you're not accredited."<p>Until the rules change, don't bother emailing me. Until then it's just a tease, and a little insulting at the same time.
评论 #5447472 未加载
plusbryanabout 12 years ago
What's the difference between wefunder and Funders Club?
breckabout 12 years ago
Are there any sites that aren't waiting for the SEC to let unaccredited investors invest?<p>I wonder if there will be a YouTube equivalent in this space: a company that turns a blind eye to unaccredited investors participating, and as a result captures a huge lead in the market. IIRC user submitted illegal content was an early driver of a lot of traffic to YouTube.
评论 #5446818 未加载
评论 #5446807 未加载
评论 #5447165 未加载
评论 #5446800 未加载
joonixabout 12 years ago
Hmm, Wevorce raises some questions. I don't know if their disclaimer about how they are not really a law firm would pass muster. If they are providing legal services, they can't raise funds from non-lawyers.
irollboozersabout 12 years ago
This is going to be such a powerful tool in the future. Any investors who sleep on this are going to miss out because whoever wins this space will be a public company, hands down.
scottnycabout 12 years ago
I really like this. However, I don't see anything regarding the terms and valuation which I would invest at. How can one responsibly invest without know what my $1000 actually gets me?<p>If the process is that the valuation will be set once funds are raised and I will have the option to back out at that point - then this needs to be spelled out. Some clarity here is needed.
评论 #5448068 未加载
minimaxirabout 12 years ago
<i>Ramen profitable since Oct 2012</i><p>That's an odd bullet point. "We make barely enough money and we've been doing it for 5 months!"
rpicardabout 12 years ago
I find it interesting that they didn't go to great lengths to hide the identities of the "mystery" companies.
评论 #5446694 未加载